On 12.08.2015 at 08:44, Anatol Belski wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecke...@gmx.de]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:09 PM
>> To: Anatol Belski <anatol....@belski.net>; 'PHP internals'
>> <internals@lists.php.net>
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libpcre version requirements
>>
>> Still, I would suggest to raise the libpcre requirements to PCRE >= 8.0 for 
>> PHP 7.0
>> or at least for PHP 7.1.
>
> [...] However look - http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/os-linux/all/all 
> . From those, CentOS 5/6 releases are not even a year old and contain 6.6, 
> 7.x but take 20% of all the Linux market share. Note that according to that 
> Linux takes only 35.9% of it. Now, say disregarding CentOS 5 and other 
> rare/too old platforms, the other 65% of the usages are not taken into 
> account. So how much loss on PHP7 adoption would happen, is a question. Maybe 
> there are other stats, just operating on what is available.
> 
> On the other hand  - as with the bug #70232, is it really worth disabling the 
> whole PCRE just to be sure one bug is fixed? I would see it as not being 
> such.  It is clear, that no distro will suddenly be upgrading from say PHP 
> 5.3 to PHP7 in an older branch, but keeping as much compat as possible will 
> allow third party repositories to still provide PHP7 there. This is at least 
> my reason to say the version shouldn't be raised - as it shouldn't go beyond 
> 7.x at least because of CentOS 6, and then it is probably useless to do it 
> ATM. As long as it doesn't block the work towards future, at least.

Well, then it might be best to leave the requirements as they are for
now. :)

-- 
Christoph M. Becker


-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to