is largely untrue.
-[Unknown]
Original Message
-Original Message-
From: Richard Quadling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 11:52 AM
To: Dmitry Stogov; PHP Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Supporting version specific INI files
Hello Dmitry,
Monday, August 7, 2006, 10:25:48 AM, you wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Quadling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 11:52 AM
>> To: Dmitry Stogov; PHP Developers Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] S
On 07/08/06, Dmitry Stogov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you setup IIS to run PHP from share?
Then you have to record path to php in IIS metabse.
How is it different from storing path in the registry?
We have many applications here which are loaded from a central app
server. Both GUI and CLI ap
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Quadling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 11:52 AM
> To: Dmitry Stogov; PHP Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Supporting version specific INI files
> as well as SAPI specific INI files.
>
Dmitry,
We seem to be on entirely different sides of the fence.
I've answered your comments below.
If I have not explained myself well enough, then so be it, I'll abide
by the decision of the developers.
I DO thank you for the consideration that you've given and I hope that
just because I disa
.
Thanks. Dmitry.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Quadling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 7:25 PM
> To: Andi Gutmans
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Supporting version specific INI files
> as well as SAPI specific IN
purpose but just
checking :)
Andi
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Quadling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 8:25 AM
> To: Andi Gutmans
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Supporting version specific INI files
> as well
2006 6:53 AM
> > To: internals@lists.php.net
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Supporting version specific INI files
> > as well as SAPI specific INI files.
> >
> > Do I have to do anything else to get this patch submitted?
> >
> > Is there anything more required wit
.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Quadling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 6:53 AM
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Supporting version specific INI files
> as well as SAPI specific INI files.
>
> Do I have to do anyth
ding 5 and 5.1 and 5.1.4?
That's weird.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Quadling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 6:53 AM
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Supporting version specific INI files
> as well as SAPI spec
Do I have to do anything else to get this patch submitted?
Is there anything more required within it?
Where do I go from here?
Do I need a sponsor?
Do I have to get a CVS account with adequate karma to commit the patch myself?
Anyone? Is there anyone out there?
Patch can be retrieved from ht
Hi Richard,
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Quadling"
> NOTE: I am NOT able to verify this code as I am not yet able to
> compile PHP. I'm still learning this, so please accept my apologies
> for any syntax errors, bugs. I'm more than willing to fix them! And if
> anyone has used MS
The supplied patch enhances PHP's .INI from ...
php-%sapi-name%.ini
to ...
php%php-version%-%sapi-module-name%.ini
php%php-major-version%.%php-minor-version%.%php-release-version%-%sapi-module-name%.ini
php%php-major-version%.%php-minor-version%-%sapi-module-name%.ini
php%php-major-version%-%sa
My main focus is on the Windows environment. I'm not in a position to
make any judgements about non windows platforms. As such, my patches
are to extend the capabilities of the windows precompiled binaries.
Most webservers should be able to map different extensions to
different handlers.
As I've
While the php.ini system is under consideration... and with an eye to
the far future... what about an import directive to include another ini
file?
Not that it is exactly the same, but you have this in configure:
--with-config-file-scan-dir=PATH
Set the path where to scan for configuration
> On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 13:52 +0200, Ron Korving wrote:
> > What kind of extensions would you suggest people use?
> >
> > index.php51 ?
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 15:58, Matthew C. Kavanagh wrote:
> Assuming it's possible, I would set which PHP version to associate with
> .php on a .htaccess or vhost
Assuming it's possible, I would set which PHP version to associate with
.php on a .htaccess or vhost basis.
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 13:52 +0200, Ron Korving wrote:
> What kind of extensions would you suggest people use?
>
> index.php51 ?
>
> - Ron
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Maili
I suppose this would have to be the case.
I did think about major, major_minor, major_minor_release and
major_minor_release_extra (for _dev).
But then that is a HUGE number of options. But, you DON'T have to use
them. The fallback is EXACTLY as it is at the moment.
If that is OK, then I'll add
What kind of extensions would you suggest people use?
index.php51 ?
- Ron
"Edin Kadribasic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi Richard,
>
> I think your ini changes should be put into PHP. I have a small feature
> request. Since we're modifying the way ini files
Hi Richard,
I think your ini changes should be put into PHP. I have a small feature
request. Since we're modifying the way ini files are picked up we might
as well add support for minor version numbers since PHP is not binary
compatible between minor version releases. That would allow people to
ru
Having used regmon, in conjunction with the source (still learning my
way around the source), PHP accesses the following registry keys :
HKLM\SOFTWARE\PHP\IniFilePath
HKLM\SOFTWARE\PHP\Per Directory Values
What naming convention would you expect to be used for version
specific settings. I would
RQ>>Secondly, I would like to be able to use PHP4, PHP5 and PHP6 together
RQ>>at the same time. Preferably ISAPI rather than CGI (mainly persistent
RQ>>DB connections).
You may want to look into some FastCGI solution. They should have little
problem running several PHP versions, and performance
Hi.
First up, I use windows. I do NOT use Apache. I also do not use IIS. I
use Sambar Server as this fits my needs very well and is extremely
easy to work with and I can get a client's intranet running in a few
minutes. I'm not saying it is BETTER, just fits my requirements.
Secondly, I would li
gt; To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Supporting version specific INI files as
> well as SAPI specific INI files.
>
> Hi.
>
> First up, I use windows.
>
> Secondly, I would like to be able to use PHP5 and PHP6
> together at the same time as ISAPI rather than CGI.
Hi.
First up, I use windows.
Secondly, I would like to be able to use PHP5 and PHP6 together at the
same time as ISAPI rather than CGI.
I can currently use PHP4 (CGI) and PHP5 (ISAPI) and I can use
different INI files for each (PHP4 uses php.ini, PHP5 CLI uses
php-cli.ini, PHP5 ISAPI uses php-i
25 matches
Mail list logo
