After some off-list discussion with Pierre and Rasmus, I think we
should move forward with the approach of JITting the whole array at
once (similar to how it's done now, except at runtime). It seems to be
the least of all evils and allows the flexibility of choosing encoding
at runtime. What co
Your proposal was to have a couple of separate functions that people
would use to access GPC data and retrieve it in Unicode form, no?
-Andrei
On Jan 30, 2007, at 8:39 AM, Pierre wrote:
On 1/30/07, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course we won't drop it, but it would contain ra
On 1/30/07, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course we won't drop it, but it would contain raw binary data (as
opposed to the rest of the PHP environment in unicode semantics mode).
IMO, it is inconsistent and confusing to the end user.
I do not follow you. Why would it contain raw
Of course we won't drop it, but it would contain raw binary data (as
opposed to the rest of the PHP environment in unicode semantics mode).
IMO, it is inconsistent and confusing to the end user.
-A
On Jan 29, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Pierre wrote:
Please, who said we will *drop* the GPC array? That
On 1/29/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, January 27, 2007 5:16 am, Pierre wrote:
> On 1/27/07, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Good luck trying to retrain millions of programmers to use a CGI
>> object or a function to retrieve GPC values.
>
> You will be surpris
On Sat, January 27, 2007 5:16 am, Pierre wrote:
> On 1/27/07, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Good luck trying to retrain millions of programmers to use a CGI
>> object or a function to retrieve GPC values.
>
> You will be surprised, really :)
I doubt it.
We haven't even gotten ever
On 1/29/07, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh! It was not a +1 from me for this patch, I still prefer my simpler
> solution (which has to be written ;). However, as a temporary/test
> code Sara's patch can do it for now no?
What's the reason to commit "temporary test code" to CV
Oh! It was not a +1 from me for this patch, I still prefer my simpler
solution (which has to be written ;). However, as a temporary/test
code Sara's patch can do it for now no?
What's the reason to commit "temporary test code" to CVS? If one wants
to play with it, one can always apply a patch.
Hi Andi,
On 1/27/07, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
s during PHP 5 where I warned that they might introduce bugs in other
areas but it's hard to forsee. No one believed me because I couldn't
give a concrete enough example and we had quite a few of those bugs
afterwards.
Given the stat
ndrei Zmievski'
> Cc: 'Sara Golemon'; internals@lists.php.net; 'Andi Gutmans';
> 'Zeev Suraski'; 'Stanislav Malyshev'
> Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Runtime-JIT, the whole enchilada
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Pierre
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Runtime-JIT, the whole enchilada
>
> Hello Andrei,
>
> On 1/27/07, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Good luck trying to retrain millions of programmers to use a CGI
> > object or a function to retrieve GPC values.
>
>
aski; Stanislav Malyshev
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Runtime-JIT, the whole enchilada
>
>
> Hello Andrei,
>
> On 1/27/07, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Good luck trying to retrain millions of programmers to use a CGI
> > object or a functi
> -Original Message-
> From: Pierre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 2:16 PM
> To: Andrei Zmievski
> Cc: Dmitry Stogov; Sara Golemon; internals@lists.php.net;
> Andi Gutmans; Zeev Suraski; Stanislav Malyshev
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] R
Hello Andrei,
On 1/27/07, Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good luck trying to retrain millions of programmers to use a CGI
object or a function to retrieve GPC values.
You will be surprised, really :)
Really, how much of a
performance hit is Sara's patch going to be, compared to o
Good luck trying to retrain millions of programmers to use a CGI
object or a function to retrieve GPC values. Really, how much of a
performance hit is Sara's patch going to be, compared to other things
in PHP 6?
-Andrei
On Jan 26, 2007, at 3:38 PM, Pierre wrote:
That's somehow my thought
> Zmievski'; Zeev Suraski; Stanislav Malyshev
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Runtime-JIT, the whole enchilada
>
>
> > I fixed one error in your patch, so now it passes all tests.
> >
> Which error? I notice some changes related to minimizing performance
> impact, but I&#x
Hi Sara,
> -Original Message-
> From: Sara Golemon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 8:11 PM
> To: Dmitry Stogov
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net; 'Andi Gutmans'; 'Andrei
> Zmievski'; Zeev Suraski; Stanislav Malyshev
> Subj
I fixed one error in your patch, so now it passes all tests.
Which error? I notice some changes related to minimizing performance
impact, but I'm not seeing what I did wrong. Just curious for my own
benefit on that one.
BTW I am against this patch.
Fair enough.
1) It adds sloppily built
I fixed one error in your patch, so now it passes all tests.
Which error? I notice some changes related to minimizing performance
impact, but I'm not seeing what I did wrong. Just curious for my own
benefit on that one.
BTW I am against this patch.
Fair enough.
1) It adds sloppily built
Hi Dmitry,
On 1/26/07, Dmitry Stogov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Sara,
I fixed one error in your patch, so now it passes all tests.
BTW I am against this patch.
1) It adds sloppily built functionality into the core and slowdowns EACH
dimension or property fetch both at run-time and compilat
uary 24, 2007 10:58 PM
> To: internals@lists.php.net; Dmitry Stogov; Andi Gutmans;
> Andrei Zmievski
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Runtime-JIT, the whole enchilada
>
>
> Dmitry-
>
>You asked for it, you get it :) Hopefully it'll be
> self-explanatory,
>
What are the numbers before the patch?
On 24-Jan-07, at 2:58 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:
Dmitry-
You asked for it, you get it :) Hopefully it'll be self-
explanatory, the one part I hope you don't notice is that I put the
auto_global check back into fetch_simple_variable_ex in order to
for
Dmitry-
You asked for it, you get it :) Hopefully it'll be self-explanatory,
the one part I hope you don't notice is that I put the auto_global check
back into fetch_simple_variable_ex in order to force direct access to
autoglobals ($foo = $_GET;foreach($_POST as ...) etc...) as
non-a
23 matches
Mail list logo
