2008/11/5 Cristian Rodríguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Lukas Kahwe Smith escribió:
>
>> Also should there be some other way to get STDOUT and STDERR defined
>
> I assume we are talking about userland constants right ?
Yes, userland constants defined with define().
>
>
> --
> "Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick
2008/11/5 Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 04.11.2008, at 23:02, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>
>>
>> On 27.10.2008, at 08:26, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
>>
>>> 2008/10/27 Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 27.10.2008, at 06:16, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> 2008
Lukas Kahwe Smith escribió:
> Also should there be some other way to get STDOUT and STDERR defined
I assume we are talking about userland constants right ?
--
"Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two (you can't have all three)."
Cristian Rodríguez R.
Platform/OpenSUSE - Core Services
SUSE LINUX Produ
On 04.11.2008, at 23:02, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 27.10.2008, at 08:26, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2008/10/27 Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 27.10.2008, at 06:16, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2008/10/26 Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:32 +0
On 27.10.2008, at 08:26, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2008/10/27 Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 27.10.2008, at 06:16, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2008/10/26 Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:32 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
So, I propose its
At any rate I am very sure I never stumbled over code defining a
> constant with a ressource.
I did stumble over such thing ;)
Not a very good idea to support ressources,
> especially given the obvious WTF's this causes (as you rightly pointed
> out).
http://stuff.cristianrodriguez.net/patch
2008/10/27 Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 27.10.2008, at 06:16, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
>
>> 2008/10/26 Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:32 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
So, I propose its either being a "supported" feature, or
On 27.10.2008, at 06:16, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2008/10/26 Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:32 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
So, I propose its either being a "supported" feature, or simply
put an
deprecation notice on it (5.3) and remove it HEAD. I p
2008/10/26 Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:32 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
>> So, I propose its either being a "supported" feature, or simply put an
>> deprecation notice on it (5.3) and remove it HEAD. I personally vote
>> for the last option, as I don't thi
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:32 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> So, I propose its either being a "supported" feature, or simply put an
> deprecation notice on it (5.3) and remove it HEAD. I personally vote
> for the last option, as I don't think resources should be constants as
> they do not have
Gday internals
Today I felt over a topic while looking at some documentation bugs,
and as the title says its the Resource constants. From what I could
understand by asking Felipe and reading over some bug reports and such
then resource constants aren't really supported. I had a play around
with it
11 matches
Mail list logo