At any rate I am very sure I never stumbled over code defining a
> constant with a ressource. 

I did stumble over such thing ;)

Not a very good idea to support ressources,
> especially given the obvious WTF's this causes (as you rightly pointed
> out). 

http://stuff.cristianrodriguez.net/patches/define-no-resources-5_3.patch

> However I am not
> sure about removing this though,

Why not ? it is documented that it only scalar values are accepted, the
code does other thing though =) objects that can be casted to string
also work without warning..


-- 
"A computer is like an Old Testament god, with a lot of rules and no
mercy. "

Cristian Rodríguez R.
Platform/OpenSUSE - Core Services
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Research & Development
http://www.opensuse.org/


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to