Andreas Korthaus wrote:
Greg Beaver wrote:
Was the removal of most pear package in 4.3.11 intentional?
Yes.
Has this been announced somewhere? I did not see anything in ChangeLog
and release notes.
This and the other issues you raise below are PEAR issues, not internals
issues, and are/have been
Andreas Korthaus wrote:
If you want to rely on users to install packages (which is a good idea
IMHO) all users (not only superusers) need a reliable tool for
installation/management (also without shell-account).
Greg has made significant progress in this area (PEAR 1.4's remote
installation cap
Greg Beaver wrote:
Was the removal of most pear package in 4.3.11 intentional?
Yes.
Has this been announced somewhere? I did not see anything in ChangeLog
and release notes.
The only other change being considered for the future would be to
make it easier to install PEAR by providing a single fil
Brian J. France wrote:
Was the removal of most pear package in 4.3.11 intentional?
Yes.
Will any of them come back, will any of the .11 packages be removed or
an other changes coming?
No. The only other change being considered for the future would be to
make it easier to install PEAR by providin
