Hi:
okey, if there is no objection, I will update the zbacktrace. :)
thanks
2011/12/6 Johannes Schlüter :
> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 17:59 +0800, Laruence wrote:
>> Hi:
>> I am not sure whether is okey to change the existing zbacktrace,
>> so I open a thread that let people know.
>>
>>
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 17:59 +0800, Laruence wrote:
> Hi:
> I am not sure whether is okey to change the existing zbacktrace,
> so I open a thread that let people know.
>
> after that I change the patch, add a new zbacktrace_ex. I think
> this should be okey, so I commit it. :)
I don't
Hi:
I am not sure whether is okey to change the existing zbacktrace,
so I open a thread that let people know.
after that I change the patch, add a new zbacktrace_ex. I think
this should be okey, so I commit it. :)
sorry & thanks
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Laruence, I think that there is no point opening a thread if you will go
ahead and commit after waiting 3 hours and 0 replies.
Or did I miss someting here?
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Laruence wrote:
> Hi:
> I update the patch, instead of change the behavior of zbacktrace,
> I add a new
Hi:
I update the patch, instead of change the behavior of zbacktrace,
I add a new one "zbacktrace_ex",
I am going to commit it, if there comes some problems, then we
could revert or edit it.
thanks
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Laruence wrote:
> Hi:
> I am plan to commit a new chan
Hi:
patch upateded, http://pastebin.com/cr6N7NUx
thanks
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Laruence wrote:
> Hi:
> I am plan to commit a new change to 5.4-trunk/.gdbinit which can be
> found at http://pastebin.com/N6hTRMRA.
>
> after update, the zbacktrace will print arguments info:
>
>
