Johannes Schlüter schlueters.de> writes:
> I think in 5.3 we don't need changes. 5.3 is a stable stable stable
> branch. Fixing bugs, ok, changing behavior: No go.
>
> I haven't looked at it in detail, though.
>
> johannes
>
Indeed, 5.3 seems very stable. We ran many tests.
Regards,
Max Bens
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> If you are okay with the changes in principle, I will fix the
>> remaining issues asap. If you think that the changes are too intrusive
>> for release branches, I'll gladly revert them for 5.3/5.4. I didn't
>> quite expect that there
Hi!
> If you are okay with the changes in principle, I will fix the
> remaining issues asap. If you think that the changes are too intrusive
> for release branches, I'll gladly revert them for 5.3/5.4. I didn't
> quite expect that there will be so many changes.
I think changes with adding new fun
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> I think in 5.3 we don't need changes. 5.3 is a stable stable stable
> branch. Fixing bugs, ok, changing behavior: No go.
Agreed.
One question: When I revert the changes to 5.3 should I also revert
the original change that was released in
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 01:14 +0200, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> If you are okay with the changes in principle, I will fix the
> remaining issues asap. If you think that the changes are too intrusive
> for release branches, I'll gladly revert them for 5.3/5.4. I didn't
> quite expect that there will be
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I see that there were significant changes committed to JSON extension in
> 5.3 and 5.4 recently. These changes modify json_encode behavior, break
> tests (pass001.1_64bit.phpt does not work anymore for me), are not
> clearly documente
