Hi! > If you are okay with the changes in principle, I will fix the > remaining issues asap. If you think that the changes are too intrusive > for release branches, I'll gladly revert them for 5.3/5.4. I didn't > quite expect that there will be so many changes.
I think changes with adding new functions, etc. are too intrusive for 5.3/5.4. If you have any fixes that can be done without it, please describe them and let's see if they fit stable versions. Otherwise, let's go back to stable. In any case, the tests should be fixed too. > Apart from that one test, does anything else fail for you? I didn't > notice that one test because I'm running on 32bit. That's the only test that failed for me in 5.4. > Regarding documentation, should these changes be documented in detail > in NEWS? Or does it suffice to update the documentation? For > UPGRADING, which one should it go in? Just 5.3? It would be best to have short description in UPGRADING and full description in the docs. NEWS should have short mention of it. But since we're talking about moving all substantial changes to 5.5, that's where it should be. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
