Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [sqlite] PHP5 && SQLite3

2004-10-21 Thread Jevon Wright
uot;internals" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 5:55 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [sqlite] PHP5 && SQLite3 > I think this is something which belongs to user-land. I don't see a reason > not to implement it in that way. > > Andi > > At

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [sqlite] PHP5 && SQLite3

2004-10-21 Thread Andi Gutmans
I think this is something which belongs to user-land. I don't see a reason not to implement it in that way. Andi At 11:04 AM 10/21/2004 -0400, Greg Beaver wrote: f) if at all possible, It would be very good if the exception signature could be modified to accept another exception object as a thir

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [sqlite] PHP5 && SQLite3

2004-10-21 Thread Greg Beaver
Andi Gutmans wrote: At 01:29 PM 10/20/2004 +0100, Wez Furlong wrote: PDO is something that quite a few of us want to see as the recommended database API for PHP 5.1. We haven't laid any definite plans for the 5.1 feature list yet (it's probably a good time for us to start thinking about that here

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [sqlite] PHP5 && SQLite3

2004-10-21 Thread Derick Rethans
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote: > I definitely think it's starting to become time to talk about what's going > to be in PHP 5.1. I see the main features I would like to see in 5.1 as: > a) PDO support for most popular DBs. Maybe you can give a status report of > where PDO is today and how

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [sqlite] PHP5 && SQLite3

2004-10-20 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 01:29 PM 10/20/2004 +0100, Wez Furlong wrote: PDO is something that quite a few of us want to see as the recommended database API for PHP 5.1. We haven't laid any definite plans for the 5.1 feature list yet (it's probably a good time for us to start thinking about that here on internals@) so th

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [sqlite] PHP5 && SQLite3

2004-10-20 Thread D. Richard Hipp
Marcus Boerger wrote: Can we expect sqlite 4 to evolve in a similar way? i hope not...and if we will simply provide a sqlite v4 pdo driver SQLite3 was designed with the idea that there would never be an SQLite4. New features may be added to SQLite3 from time to time, but there is enough flexibili

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [sqlite] PHP5 && SQLite3

2004-10-20 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Wez, Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 2:29:52 PM, you wrote: > Quoting hell, but please bear with it >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> > "julien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> does anyone know if PHP will integrate SQLite3 per default in version 5.1 ? >> >> Actually PHP 5.0.2 include onl

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [sqlite] PHP5 && SQLite3

2004-10-20 Thread Wez Furlong
Quoting hell, but please bear with it > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > "julien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> does anyone know if PHP will integrate SQLite3 per default in version 5.1 ? > >> Actually PHP 5.0.2 include only SQLite2. > > > > The plan _is_ to integrate SQLite3. There are two o

[PHP-DEV] Re: [sqlite] PHP5 && SQLite3

2004-10-19 Thread Derrell . Lipman
FYI, attached is a highly edited (for brevity) series of responses to the SQLite mailing list, to a query about SQLite3 being included in PHP 5. My reply is first. D. Richard Hipp is the author of SQLite, so his response is of particular relevance... [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > "julien" <[EMAIL