Hi!
> Warn at 2 weeks, close at 4? There's no real harm in closing it unmerged:
> the submitter can always resubmit.
That sounds way too short. I mean if we did process all worthy pulls in
matter of days, then fine (but see below) but we are very far from that.
And when we take a long time to ge
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Adam Harvey wrote:
> On 1 January 2016 at 12:12, Bishop Bettini wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:53 PM, John Bafford wrote:
> >> I think when I brought this up before, the major open discussion point
> >> before the thread died was what period of time constitu
On 1 January 2016 at 12:12, Bishop Bettini wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:53 PM, John Bafford wrote:
>> I think when I brought this up before, the major open discussion point
>> before the thread died was what period of time constituted long enough for
>> closing a waiting-on-submitter PR. 2 w
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:53 PM, John Bafford wrote:
>
> > On Jan 1, 2016, at 13:28, Bishop Bettini wrote:
>
> I think when I brought this up before, the major open discussion point
> before the thread died was what period of time constituted long enough for
> closing a waiting-on-submitter PR. 2
Hi Bishop,
> On Jan 1, 2016, at 13:28, Bishop Bettini wrote:
>
> Hi, and happy New Year!
>
> Now that the big push for PHP 7 is done, I'd like to revive earlier
> discussions on the GitHub PR triage team RFC.
>
Thanks for poking me about this. When I originally proposed the PR triage team
a
