Hi!
> Being completely fair, doesn't this actually make HackLang a great
> test-bed for PHP features? If they implement something, and people
I'm not sure how it can be a testbed for *PHP* features, if they develop
them with next to no input from PHP community. At least as far as I
know, maybe I
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
>
> The same usually applies to ~, {, }, [ and ].
> I personally stopped buying non-en_US keyboards and that's it.
> Basically, if you code you kinda want to use en_US layout anyway (or dvorak
> if you had too much free time).
> I realize that t
Hi Anthony,
Anthony Ferrara wrote:
Being completely fair, doesn't this actually make HackLang a great
test-bed for PHP features? If they implement something, and people
hate it/it sucks, boom. But if people love it, it's a no brainer for
us to "steal".
I don't think we should blindly accept an
Hi Marco,
Marco Pivetta wrote:
On 7 September 2015 at 06:33, Pavel Kouřil wrote:
Also, I realized it's definitely harder to write ~ than =. On my
keyboard layout (Czech Qwerty) I have to do "right alt + shift + (key
above Tab)". I'm not sure how it is with other non-US keyboard
layouts, but i
Anthony Ferrara wrote on 07/09/2015 11:23:
Being completely fair, doesn't this actually make HackLang a great
test-bed for PHP features? If they implement something, and people
hate it/it sucks, boom. But if people love it, it's a no brainer for
us to "steal".
I don't think we should blindly acc
Rowan
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Rowan Collins wrote:
> Andrea Faulds wrote on 06/09/2015 22:54:
>>
>> Also, it would be nice if PHP and Hack don't diverge when implementing the
>> same features, unless there's a particularly good reason... it's not very
>> kind to people who use both langu
Andrea Faulds wrote on 06/09/2015 22:54:
Also, it would be nice if PHP and Hack don't diverge when implementing
the same features, unless there's a particularly good reason... it's
not very kind to people who use both languages.
While I agree with the sentiment of them not diverging, the probl
On 7 September 2015 at 06:33, Pavel Kouřil wrote:
> Hello,
>
> these are all good points.
>
> Also, I realized it's definitely harder to write ~ than =. On my
> keyboard layout (Czech Qwerty) I have to do "right alt + shift + (key
> above Tab)". I'm not sure how it is with other non-US keyboard
>
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> This has probably already come up, but I'd like to weigh in on the symbol
> choice.
>
> On the subject of syntax, ~> (let's call it the squiggle arrow) seems like a
> very poor choice compared to ==> (let's call it Hack's arrow).
Hi Bob,
This has probably already come up, but I'd like to weigh in on the
symbol choice.
On the subject of syntax, ~> (let's call it the squiggle arrow) seems
like a very poor choice compared to ==> (let's call it Hack's arrow).
I think it's been mentioned that ==>, Hack's arrow, was thoug
On 02/09/2015 20:44, Tom Worster wrote:
In other words, ~> will end my career. Thanks :P
I know this line is just hyperbole, but it does rather sum up the tone
of the rest of your e-mail. I'm honestly not sure how you expect anyone
to respond.
Scrolling further down, my eye lit on the last
I'm 100% with Anthony Ferrara and Tony Marston on this.
Another grumpy old curmudgeon (in addition to myself, I mean, not those
two) describes four categories of bad stylists:
1. Under educated
2. Old school
3. Thrill seeker
4. Exhibitionist
The first two are pretty clear, I think. The Thrill se
12 matches
Mail list logo
