hi Derick,
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Simple question yes/no is enough for me:
>> > Can it be done, using the build sy
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Simple question yes/no is enough for me:
> > Can it be done, using the build system, in a per-file way or only per
> > extension? (If yes per-file, I'd prefer that way, el
hi Johannes,
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simple question yes/no is enough for me:
> Can it be done, using the build system, in a per-file way or only per
> extension? (If yes per-file, I'd prefer that way, else: keep the #ifdef)
Per extension
Hi,
(should have gone out yesterday, but was hanging in my outbox...)
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 15:11 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
> > Correct PHP is supposed to work on "all" platforms therefore the
> > code has to work on Windows, too.
>
> And now it does.
Which is a good thing.
> > Now there are t
hi,
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct PHP is supposed to work on "all" platforms therefore the code
> has to work on Windows, too.
And now it does.
> Now there are two questions Derick ask, which I see as valid questions:
> a) Why does it b
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 22:15 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
> Hi Derick,
>
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > you're not reading what I said. It does not make one single bit of sense
> > that a short function gives problems while an enormously long fu
Hi Derick,
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you're not reading what I said. It does not make one single bit of sense
> that a short function gives problems while an enormously long function
> is fine. This does *NOT* make sense. If you have no idea eithe
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> >
> >> pajoyeSat Aug 2 16:49:56 2008 UTC
> >>
> >> Modified files:
> >> /php-src/ext/date config.w32
> >>
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
>
>> pajoyeSat Aug 2 16:49:56 2008 UTC
>>
>> Modified files:
>> /php-src/ext/date config.w32
>> /php-src/ext/date/lib parse_iso_intervals.re
>> L
derick Sat Oct 1 11:07:21 2005 EDT
Modified files:
/php-src/ext/date php_date.c
/php-src/ext/date/lib fallbackmap.h timezonemap.h .cvsignore
parse_date.c timelib.h timelib_structs.h
/php-src/ext/date/lib/resource parse_date.re
/php-src/ext/date/tests date_def
gt; >preferably in words of one syllable. (Derick: polite ones? ;)
> >
> >- Steph
> >
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Pierre-Alain Joye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>
;Pierre-Alain Joye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ;
"Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/date...
+1
On 7/20/05, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys, work [EMAIL PROTECTED] Y
polite ones? ;)
- Steph
- Original Message -
From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pierre-Alain Joye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/date...
> Guys,
>
&g
+1
On 7/20/05, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys, work [EMAIL PROTECTED] You'll get the best results and ultimately our
> goal
> is to provide the best solutions to PHP users, not spend time in politics
> and on ego trips.
>
> I'm not going to play policeman (and I shouldn't). You g
To: "Pierre-Alain Joye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/date...
> Guys,
>
> Regarding Derick's commit, it's a very technical matter. It's commented
and
> not enabled.
Guys,
Regarding Derick's commit, it's a very technical matter. It's commented and
not enabled. Now new features crept in and after reviewing the patch, I
felt that it's not dangerous nor complicated to let it sit in CVS
commented. As you can see it's very isolated code so there's still room fo
Adding something like this without namespaces is just a suicide.
Please use a prefix for your class names (Zend_Date, Main_Date, Zend_TimeZone or
something).
__
http://www.sentimente.ro
Singur? Peste 180.000 utilizatori pentru tine!
--
PHP Internals -
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 11:07, Derick Rethans wrote:
> It's not in the code and commented out with an ifdef, so that I can get
> it into CVS, make sure I can commit all fixes too that are needed
> without getting conflicts or non maintanable patches. I discussed this
> with Andi and he was ok wit
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:40:20 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edin Kadribasic) wrote:
> Derick,
>
> Didn't we agree not to do this until 5.1 was released? Please
> revert the object support.
Derick told me on IRC that he agreed on that with Andi.
I still think that we should not expose the new lib now.
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> Derick,
>
> Didn't we agree not to do this until 5.1 was released? Please revert the
> object support.
It's not in the code and commented out with an ifdef, so that I can get
it into CVS, make sure I can commit all fixes too that are needed
withou
Derick,
Didn't we agree not to do this until 5.1 was released? Please revert the
object support.
Edin
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 10:31, Derick Rethans wrote:
> derick Wed Jul 20 04:31:04 2005 EDT
>
> Added files:
> /php-src/ext/date/tests date_create-1.phpt date_create-2.phpt
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
