Allright,
I think we can push an RC1 later on this week and depending on how
well it does move onto the final in the coming weeks. After reviewing
the PHP 5.2 changelog I think it is not unrealistic to get a version
out by the end of the month or early November.
On 6-Oct-08, at 2:27 PM,
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 14:07 -0400, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> 5.2 necessity depends entirely on the availability dates of PHP 5.3
> and presence of critical fixes that absolutely require a 5.2.X
> release.If Lukas does not see a 5.3 release happening until end of
> November, we can definitely
hi Ilia,
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 5.2 necessity depends entirely on the availability dates of PHP 5.3 and
> presence of critical fixes that absolutely require a 5.2.X release.If Lukas
> does not see a 5.3 release happening until end of November,
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 20:07, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 5.2 necessity depends entirely on the availability dates of PHP 5.3 and
> presence of critical fixes that absolutely require a 5.2.X release.If Lukas
> does not see a 5.3 release happening until end of November, we can
> de
5.2 necessity depends entirely on the availability dates of PHP 5.3
and presence of critical fixes that absolutely require a 5.2.X
release.If Lukas does not see a 5.3 release happening until end of
November, we can definitely do a 5.2.7 for the end of October...
On 3-Oct-08, at 10:02 AM, Ja
2008/10/3 Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 03.10.2008, at 16:02, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
>> PHP 5.2.7 is long overdue already. Propably due to the RM being AWOL for
>> quite long time. There are several fixes in 5.2.7 that should be out there
>> yesterday. If the current RM is not inter
On 03.10.2008, at 16:02, Jani Taskinen wrote:
PHP 5.2.7 is long overdue already. Propably due to the RM being AWOL
for quite long time. There are several fixes in 5.2.7 that should be
out there yesterday. If the current RM is not interested in releases
anymore, I can take over.
I guess
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 02.10.2008, at 14:27, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
No, its for security or "critical" fixes only. I'd say that a crash
inside a key area of the code is critical...
Hmmh.. Does this mean that 5.2 is dead and all the unreleased 5.2 NEWS
entries should be moved to 5_3?
On 02.10.2008, at 14:27, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
No, its for security or "critical" fixes only. I'd say that a crash
inside a key area of the code is critical...
Hmmh.. Does this mean that 5.2 is dead and all the unreleased 5.2
NEWS
entries should be moved to 5_3?
Just to give persp
No, its for security or "critical" fixes only. I'd say that a crash
inside a key area of the code is critical...
On 1-Oct-08, at 5:01 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 22:30, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
iliaa Wed Oct 1 20:30:24 2008 UTC
Modified
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 22:30, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> iliaa Wed Oct 1 20:30:24 2008 UTC
>
> Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_3)
>/php-src/ext/pgsql pgsql.c
>/php-srcNEWS
> Log:
>
> Fixed bug #46206 (pg_query_params/pg_execute convert passe
11 matches
Mail list logo
