Hello Piotr,
Friday, July 22, 2005, 8:41:28 PM, you wrote:
> On Friday 22 of July 2005 19:56, Johannes Schlueter wrote:
>> A build with spl statically compiled in is for me just a few k bigger than
>> a build without spl. But building spl shared wouldn't work well for two
>> reasons: It deals wit
On Friday 22 of July 2005 19:56, Johannes Schlueter wrote:
> A build with spl statically compiled in is for me just a few k bigger than
> a build without spl. But building spl shared wouldn't work well for two
> reasons: It deals with quite engine-near stuff (like overriding the []
> syntax or __au
Hi Piotr,
On Friday 22 July 2005 15:15, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> I'm trying to compile the latest PHP without compiled-in extensions so I
> could loaded them later from php.ini. Unfortunately I've found that
> standard depends on spl (spl_ce_Countable) and date. At least the second is
> very smal
Hi,
I'm trying to compile the latest PHP without compiled-in extensions so I could
loaded them later from php.ini. Unfortunately I've found that standard
depends on spl (spl_ce_Countable) and date. At least the second is very small
library, but the first depends on libxml and other extensions,
