On Friday 22 of July 2005 19:56, Johannes Schlueter wrote: > A build with spl statically compiled in is for me just a few k bigger than > a build without spl. But building spl shared wouldn't work well for two > reasons: It deals with quite engine-near stuff (like overriding the [] > syntax or __autoload()) and other extensions behave different depending on > wether it was compiled in or not (for example MySQLi's MysqliException is > extended from SPL's RuntimeException if available at compile time) > > btw. I don't see a reason for building basic extensions as shared...
In the other way, SPL requires compiled-in XML library because if even I can get XML in shared extension then SPL will be without SimpleXMLIterator, etc. Should I consider spl with simplexml as basic extensions? I'd like to have very light php binary so it could be used as interpreter for system scripts. > I can't reproduce this on my readline-powered box and your link states "We > believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of > libedit" if not please report to the libedit guys or use readline. ;-) Still it is not fixed. The readline library is GPL and is not compatible with PHP license, so the libedit is the only choise. -- .''`. Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA : :' : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
