On 1/27/07, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Btw, for people who truly need the Unicode support I actually do think we might
want to consider requiring them to fetch the input
variables through a new API and/or object. I don't think we need to make it seamless if
the "default" behavior w
Hi Andi,
On 1/27/07, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Sara,
I don't feel to great with this patch. It kind of feels like twisting the
language implementation around for some very specific
problem which probably shouldn't be fixed at this level. Andrei says
performance of Unicode isn'
On Jan 27, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hi Sara,
I don't feel to great with this patch. It kind of feels like
twisting the language implementation around for some very specific
problem which probably shouldn't be fixed at this level. Andrei
says performance of Unicode isn't great so
ing) isn't good enough...
Andi
> -Original Message-
> From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 9:15 AM
> To: 'Sara Golemon'; 'internals@lists.php.net'; 'Andrei
> Zmievski'; 'Dmitry Stogov'
).
Andi
> -Original Message-
> From: Sara Golemon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 11:02 AM
> To: internals@lists.php.net; Andrei Zmievski; Andi Gutmans;
> Dmitry Stogov
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Autoglobal CVs without silence -- Summary
>
>
Sara wrote:
> I've produced a couple of major lightbulb moments
in people with this explanation, but it all stems from
introducing the concept of an object's handle rather than
saying objects are reference by default.
i usually got these "aha!" events when using inodes
and hard links as metaphe
> -Original Message-
> From: Sara Golemon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 January 2007 19:02
> * - Sidenote: I refuse to call object behavior "reference by
> default",
> I've had too many people notice that it's not actually true
Hear, hear. My favourite terminology here (and I'
>> OK. Now your patch will work, but I would like to
>> think about more elegant solution.
>> The problem that I am busy with other work.
>> Could you please wait a week and then commit it if
>> I won't return (on the next Tuesday).
>>
> Argh. Can we please accelerate this somehow?
> This patch is
