Lars Strojny wrote:
>> I've not seen plenty of "Class::singleton()" myself, getInstance is an
>> accepted standard in all languages, including the PHP code I wrote,
>> and I've had experience with.
>
> That's my point, yes. pecl_http uses ::singleton() instead of
> getInstance().
Well, sure--that
Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> I think it's fine to have settings for limitations on pconnects, but
> stuff like http.request.methods.allowed or http.only_exceptions should
http.request.methods.allowed is handled at RINIT.
http.only_exceptions is PHP_INI_ALL, though introducing it at all might
have b
Hi Stan,
Am Dienstag, den 28.10.2008, 14:33 +0200 schrieb Stan Vassilev | FM:
[...]
> I've not seen plenty of "Class::singleton()" myself, getInstance is an
> accepted standard in all languages, including the PHP code I wrote,
> and I've had experience with.
That's my point, yes. pecl_http uses :
I've not seen plenty of "Class::singleton()" myself, getInstance is an
accepted standard in all languages, including the PHP code I wrote, and I've
had experience with.
Regards, Stan Vassilev
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/un
Hi Johannes,
Am Montag, den 27.10.2008, 19:59 +0100 schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
[...]
> I think it's fine to have settings for limitations on pconnects, but
> stuff like http.request.methods.allowed or http.only_exceptions should
> imo be set as object properties (or similar), not globally using in
Johannes Schlüter escribió:
>or http.only_exceptions should
> imo be set as object properties (or similar), not globally using ini
> settings.
Or just throw only exceptions and no ini setting at all.
--
"A computer is like an Old Testament god, with a lot of rules and no
mercy. "
Cristian Rod
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 20:17 +0200, Michael Wallner wrote:
> I wonder what the general opinion is on adding pecl/http to the main PHP
> distribution? Many people have poked me in the past, so I guessed it's
> time to ask me and you that question once for all.
I didn't took a deeper look at it yet,
While overall solid, I have 1 api critique that may or may not influence
inclusion..
The naming's seem slightly awkward for HttpResponse. Seemingly,
HttpResponse is the compliment to HttpRequest given their namings. But
looking at the api (the fact that its all static methods), it leads me
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 13:54, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have not talked to Johannes about this, but unless there is a major major
> major outcry from the internals folks to add it, its too late for 5.3.
I count one "vote" against it...
-Hannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Ru
Hello Michael,
I think it is pretty useful.
marcus
Monday, September 22, 2008, 8:17:58 PM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> I wonder what the general opinion is on adding pecl/http to the main PHP
> distribution? Many people have poked me in the past, so I guessed it's
> time to ask me and you that quest
Hello Hannes,
Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 3:04:16 PM, you wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 14:54, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That being said, there is some overlap in features with existing
>> functionality. Maybe if we schedule this for PHP 6, then we might want to
>> mark
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 14:54, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That being said, there is some overlap in features with existing
> functionality. Maybe if we schedule this for PHP 6, then we might want to
> mark a few things as deprecated in PHP 5.3.
Doesn't sound like a good idea.
T
On 23.09.2008, at 14:02, Lars Strojny wrote:
Hi Michael,
Am Montag, den 22.09.2008, 20:17 +0200 schrieb Michael Wallner:
[...]
I wonder what the general opinion is on adding pecl/http to the
main PHP
distribution? Many people have poked me in the past, so I guessed
it's
time to ask me an
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 20:17, Michael Wallner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder what the general opinion is on adding pecl/http to the main PHP
> distribution?
+1
-Hannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi Michael,
Am Montag, den 22.09.2008, 20:17 +0200 schrieb Michael Wallner:
[...]
> I wonder what the general opinion is on adding pecl/http to the main PHP
> distribution? Many people have poked me in the past, so I guessed it's
> time to ask me and you that question once for all.
I would like
Hi
2008/9/22 Michael Wallner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder what the general opinion is on adding pecl/http to the main PHP
> distribution? Many people have poked me in the past, so I guessed it's
> time to ask me and you that question once for all.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
> --
> PHP Inter
I have to agree here. Is the book already closed on core extensions in 5.3?
-ralph
Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
Michael Wallner escribió:
Hi,
I wonder what the general opinion is on adding pecl/http to the main PHP
distribution? Many people have poked me in the past, so I guessed it's
time to
Michael Wallner escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder what the general opinion is on adding pecl/http to the main PHP
> distribution? Many people have poked me in the past, so I guessed it's
> time to ask me and you that question once for all.
+1000, :) probably the most useful addition in years.
--
Hi,
I wonder what the general opinion is on adding pecl/http to the main PHP
distribution? Many people have poked me in the past, so I guessed it's
time to ask me and you that question once for all.
Regards,
Mike
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: ht
19 matches
Mail list logo
