On 02/12/2014 22:44, Andrea Faulds wrote:
I’m putting the ZPP Failure on Overflow RFC to a vote. This RFC is an important
prerequisite to the Big Integer Support RFC, as it ensures safety in implicit
integer parameter conversions.
The RFC requires a 2/3 majority, and voting starts today (2014-
Hi,
> On 10 Dec 2014, at 17:21, Rowan Collins wrote:
>
> Andrea Faulds wrote on 10/12/2014 16:04:
>>
>> It looks like those changes aren’t in master. Once this RFC passes, I’d very
>> much like to see a new attempt to make the names consistent, it’s something
>> that’s bothered me. If this wa
Andrea Faulds wrote on 10/12/2014 16:04:
On 9 Dec 2014, at 15:27, Rowan Collins wrote:
Andrea Faulds wrote on 09/12/2014 14:10:
On 9 Dec 2014, at 13:23, Rowan Collins wrote:
Note that in master, the messages have been changed to (correctly) not mention the C
types, only the PHP ones, so it
> On 9 Dec 2014, at 15:27, Rowan Collins wrote:
>
> Andrea Faulds wrote on 09/12/2014 14:10:
>>> On 9 Dec 2014, at 13:23, Rowan Collins wrote:
>>>
>>> Note that in master, the messages have been changed to (correctly) not
>>> mention the C types, only the PHP ones, so it would be more like "e
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
>> On 4 Dec 2014, at 05:51, Xinchen Hui wrote:
>>
>>>
>> I am not sure if I misunderstand your proposal..
>>
>> I thought you proposal is only fail if double value is out of long range
>>
>> but from your patch, ext/date/tests/date_sunset_var
> On 4 Dec 2014, at 05:51, Xinchen Hui wrote:
>
>>
> I am not sure if I misunderstand your proposal..
>
> I thought you proposal is only fail if double value is out of long range
>
> but from your patch, ext/date/tests/date_sunset_variation9.phpt is
> fails with a double value 12.*** (which
Hey:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Good evening once again,
>
> I’m putting the ZPP Failure on Overflow RFC to a vote. This RFC is an
> important prerequisite to the Big Integer Support RFC, as it ensures safety
> in implicit integer parameter conversions.
>
> The RFC r
Good evening once again,
I’m putting the ZPP Failure on Overflow RFC to a vote. This RFC is an important
prerequisite to the Big Integer Support RFC, as it ensures safety in implicit
integer parameter conversions.
The RFC requires a 2/3 majority, and voting starts today (2014-12-02) and ends
i
