Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2008, 16:47 +0100 schrieb Lars Strojny:
[...]
> The current patch is in a bit hacky state, as I have my doubts whether
> storing the include paths as a string is a good idea. I want to gain
> some feedback for this addition first before I invest more work on it.
Just fo
On Wed, February 13, 2008 9:47 am, Lars Strojny wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> the following patch[1] adds the functions append_include_path() and
> prepend_include_path(). These function are there to make include path
> adjustments easier than it is. Especially append_include_path() is
> what
> is do
Lukas Kahwe Smith schreef:
On 14.02.2008, at 10:07, Lars Strojny wrote:
Hi Jochem,
Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2008, 00:56 +0100 schrieb Jochem Maas:
I think Lars has a point ... maybe set_include_path() could
be given a second parameter instead to mitigate the need for seperate
funcs?:
set_in
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 14.02.2008, at 10:20, Markus Fischer wrote:
Personally I never understood why we've set_include_path in the first
place anyway. "ini_set('include_path', ..." does exactly the same and
the C function does actually exactly this.
Short history lesson:
The reason for s
On 14.02.2008, at 10:07, Lars Strojny wrote:
Hi Jochem,
Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2008, 00:56 +0100 schrieb Jochem Maas:
I think Lars has a point ... maybe set_include_path() could
be given a second parameter instead to mitigate the need for seperate
funcs?:
set_include_path('foo', INCPATH_OV
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Markus Fischer wrote:
> Lars Strojny wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2008, 00:56 +0100 schrieb Jochem Maas:
> > > I think Lars has a point ... maybe set_include_path() could
> > > be given a second parameter instead to mitigate the need for seperate
> > > funcs?:
> > >
>
On 14.02.2008, at 10:20, Markus Fischer wrote:
Lars Strojny wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2008, 00:56 +0100 schrieb Jochem Maas:
I think Lars has a point ... maybe set_include_path() could
be given a second parameter instead to mitigate the need for
seperate
funcs?:
set_include_path('fo
Lars Strojny wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2008, 00:56 +0100 schrieb Jochem Maas:
I think Lars has a point ... maybe set_include_path() could
be given a second parameter instead to mitigate the need for seperate
funcs?:
set_include_path('foo', INCPATH_OVERRIDE); // default
set_include_path('f
Hi Jochem,
Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2008, 00:56 +0100 schrieb Jochem Maas:
> I think Lars has a point ... maybe set_include_path() could
> be given a second parameter instead to mitigate the need for seperate
> funcs?:
>
> set_include_path('foo', INCPATH_OVERRIDE); // default
> set_include_path('f
On Feb 14, 2008 12:05 AM, Lars Strojny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2008, 23:12 +0100 schrieb Pierre Joye:
> [...]
> > That would be a reason to have these functions (yes, path_separator is
> > required) ;-)
>
> So you agree? Thanks :)
I don't, it was a joke :
I think Lars has a point ... maybe set_include_path() could
be given a second parameter instead to mitigate the need for seperate funcs?:
set_include_path('foo', INCPATH_OVERRIDE); // default
set_include_path('foo', INCPATH_APPEND);
set_include_path('foo', INCPATH_PREPEND);
Strojny schreef:
Hi
Hi Pierre,
Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2008, 23:12 +0100 schrieb Pierre Joye:
[...]
> That would be a reason to have these functions (yes, path_separator is
> required) ;-)
So you agree? Thanks :)
cu, Lars
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php
Hi Pierre,
Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2008, 23:01 +0100 schrieb Pierre Joye:
[...]
> > the following patch[1] adds the functions append_include_path() and
> > prepend_include_path(). These function are there to make include path
> > adjustments easier than it is. Especially append_include_path() is wh
On Feb 13, 2008 11:06 PM, Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pierre Joye wrote:
> > On Feb 13, 2008 4:47 PM, Lars Strojny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> the following patch[1] adds the functions append_include_path() and
> >> prepend_include_path(). These function a
Pierre Joye wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008 4:47 PM, Lars Strojny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
the following patch[1] adds the functions append_include_path() and
prepend_include_path(). These function are there to make include path
adjustments easier than it is. Especially append_include_pat
Hi Lars,
On Feb 13, 2008 4:47 PM, Lars Strojny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> the following patch[1] adds the functions append_include_path() and
> prepend_include_path(). These function are there to make include path
> adjustments easier than it is. Especially append_include_path()
Hi everyone,
the following patch[1] adds the functions append_include_path() and
prepend_include_path(). These function are there to make include path
adjustments easier than it is. Especially append_include_path() is what
is done most of the time.
The current patch is in a bit hacky state, as I
17 matches
Mail list logo
