Lukas Kahwe Smith schreef:
On 14.02.2008, at 10:07, Lars Strojny wrote:
Hi Jochem,
Am Donnerstag, den 14.02.2008, 00:56 +0100 schrieb Jochem Maas:
I think Lars has a point ... maybe set_include_path() could
be given a second parameter instead to mitigate the need for seperate
funcs?:
set_include_path('foo', INCPATH_OVERRIDE); // default
set_include_path('foo', INCPATH_APPEND);
set_include_path('foo', INCPATH_PREPEND);
Thanks for your support, but this seems counter intuitive. Why should
*set*_include_path() be used to *append* or *prepend* to the include
path? Also learning another mouthful of constants is maybe suboptimal.
Getting used to prepend_/append_...() is easy from my point of view, as
the name is derived from what's currently present (set_include_path()).
Yeah, I agree that if at all I would go with Lars's original proposal.
point taken, I was just thinking out loud really, I didn't even know of
set_include_path() before yesterday. I happily use ini_set('include_path') and
have
no need for the extra functions ... but someone wrote them, someone might like
them
and I figure offering an idea (however stupid - heck of got so many ;-)) can't
hurt
(anything apart from my meager reputation)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
