Le mer. 10 juin 2015 à 17:20, Peter Cowburn a
écrit :
> On 28 April 2015 at 14:24, Olivier Garcia wrote:
>
> > Dear Internals,
> >
> > The "Improved Error Callback Mechanism" RFC is now in voting phase.
> >
> > You can cast your vote on the Wiki [1] and the according patch is
> > available as a
On 28 April 2015 at 14:24, Olivier Garcia wrote:
> Dear Internals,
>
> The "Improved Error Callback Mechanism" RFC is now in voting phase.
>
> You can cast your vote on the Wiki [1] and the according patch is
> available as a Pull Request [2].
>
> Vote will be open for two weeks, counting from to
Le jeu. 30 avr. 2015 à 02:26, Stanislav Malyshev a
écrit :
> Hi!
>
> > You can cast your vote on the Wiki [1] and the according patch is
> > available as a Pull Request [2].
> >
> > Vote will be open for two weeks, counting from today.
> >
>
> I think the idea of this RFC is nice but it needs a b
Le jeu. 30 avr. 2015 à 01:32, Stanislav Malyshev a
écrit :
> Hi!
>
> > The issue targeted here is "two extensions overriding php_error_cb can't
> > live side by side" and that issue exists since PHP 4.0. Should a bug
> report
> > be opened?
>
> I'm not sure why can't they live side by side.
Sin
Hi!
> we asked for feedbacks on the matter [1] [2], stating from the very
> beginning that, to our understanding, it wasn't a feature but code
> gardening.
I think introducing new engine APIs, to be used by extensions, is not
something that should be taken lightly as mere refactoring. If the
exte
Hi!
> You can cast your vote on the Wiki [1] and the according patch is
> available as a Pull Request [2].
>
> Vote will be open for two weeks, counting from today.
>
I think the idea of this RFC is nice but it needs a bit more work to
make it really good and successful. See some of the notes b
Hi!
> The issue targeted here is "two extensions overriding php_error_cb can't
> live side by side" and that issue exists since PHP 4.0. Should a bug report
> be opened?
I'm not sure why can't they live side by side. Of course, if the
override is made in incompatible manner, they can't, but the s
ALLAERT; Olivier Garcia; PHP
> > Internals;
> > Kalle Sommer Nielsen
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Improved Error Callback Mechanism
> >
> > Zeev, as the author of the php7timeline, what do you think about merging
> > this one?
>
> I think it'
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferenc Kovacs [mailto:tyr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 2:54 PM
> To: franc...@php.net; Zeev Suraski
> Cc: Pierre Joye; Adam Harvey; Patrick ALLAERT; Olivier Garcia; PHP
> Internals;
> Kalle Sommer Nielsen
> Subject:
> De : Ferenc Kovacs [mailto:tyr...@gmail.com]
>
> For PHP7 we had a previously voted on and accepted timeline
> (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php7timeline) which stated marc 15 as
> the last time for RFCs targetting php7, and as far as I can tell, everybody
> seemed to agree that any RFC targettin
Le mer. 29 avr. 2015 à 10:57, Kalle Sommer Nielsen a écrit :
> I would love to see more work toward identifying issues in PHP7, and
> hopefully we can get that once we release the first alpha.
>
The issue targeted here is "two extensions overriding php_error_cb can't
live side by side" and that
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:24 PM, François Laupretre
wrote:
> > De : Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
> >
> > I would suggest then to end the white card given with the php7 rfc
>
> +1 on this. How can we make it official ? How can we stop the changes
> merged to the PHP 7 branch every da
> De : Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
>
> I would suggest then to end the white card given with the php7 rfc
+1 on this. How can we make it official ? How can we stop the changes merged to
the PHP 7 branch every day ? Start a 7.1 branch ?
François
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime D
Le mer. 29 avr. 2015 à 03:19, Pierre Joye a écrit :
> On Apr 29, 2015 5:38 AM, "Adam Harvey" wrote:
> >
> > On 28 April 2015 at 15:10, Patrick ALLAERT
> wrote:
> > > Le mar. 28 avr. 2015 à 20:42, Kalle Sommer Nielsen a
> écrit :
> > >
> > >> I should probably have been faster at replying, but
Hi Patrick
2015-04-29 0:10 GMT+02:00 Patrick ALLAERT :
> "No go"? Isn't that a bit rough?
Well we need to be fair and hold our own policies/processes we agree
to true, else there is no point in having them.
>
> That kind of change normally doesn't require an RFC at all. We did one for
> document
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Adam Harvey wrote:
> So, please, show respect for the people working hard on PHP 7.0 [...]
Whoa, the "show respect for the people that work" card already ?
Let's all chill. Here are some kitteh.
http://lol.cat/3z
> by not trying to push something in against our
On Apr 29, 2015 5:38 AM, "Adam Harvey" wrote:
>
> On 28 April 2015 at 15:10, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> > Le mar. 28 avr. 2015 à 20:42, Kalle Sommer Nielsen a
écrit :
> >
> >> I should probably have been faster at replying, but for PHP7 this is a
> >> no-go. I realize this is a pure internal chang
On 28 April 2015 at 15:10, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> Le mar. 28 avr. 2015 à 20:42, Kalle Sommer Nielsen a écrit :
>
>> I should probably have been faster at replying, but for PHP7 this is a
>> no-go. I realize this is a pure internal change and have nothing to do
>> with userland, but as currently
Le mar. 28 avr. 2015 à 20:42, Kalle Sommer Nielsen a écrit :
> I should probably have been faster at replying, but for PHP7 this is a
> no-go. I realize this is a pure internal change and have nothing to do
> with userland, but as currently is, we are in feature freeze and it
> creates a bad prec
Hi Dennis,
Le mar. 28 avr. 2015 à 18:33, Dennis Birkholz a
écrit :
>
> just to satisfy my personal curiosity: how can this RFC target 7.0 which
> had the feature freeze over a month ago? Should it not be 7.1 just to
> treat all contributors equal?
>
We are fully aware of the feature freeze and h
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> I should probably have been faster at replying, but for PHP7 this is a
> no-go. I realize this is a pure internal change and have nothing to do
> with userland, but as currently is, we are in feature freeze and it
> creates a bad prece
Hi Olivier
2015-04-28 15:24 GMT+02:00 Olivier Garcia :
> Dear Internals,
>
> The "Improved Error Callback Mechanism" RFC is now in voting phase.
I should probably have been faster at replying, but for PHP7 this is a
no-go. I realize this is a pure internal change and have nothing to do
with userl
Hi all,
Am 28.04.2015 um 15:24 schrieb Olivier Garcia:
> The "Improved Error Callback Mechanism" RFC is now in voting phase.
just to satisfy my personal curiosity: how can this RFC target 7.0 which
had the feature freeze over a month ago? Should it not be 7.1 just to
treat all contributors equal?
Dear Internals,
The "Improved Error Callback Mechanism" RFC is now in voting phase.
You can cast your vote on the Wiki [1] and the according patch is
available as a Pull Request [2].
Vote will be open for two weeks, counting from today.
Kind regards,
[1] https://wiki.php.net/rfc/improved_erro
24 matches
Mail list logo
