Hi!
--stas_s->option->because_I_could_not_read_that_code;
Can't or won't? :) I have very hard time to believe you don't know what
-> means.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
(408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP
Hello Lukas,
--stas_s->option->because_I_could_not_read_that_code;
marcus
Thursday, October 16, 2008, 6:51:29 PM, you wrote:
> On 16.10.2008, at 16:14, Steph Fox wrote:
>> Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and
>> relevant
>> opinion, express it now? We don't ha
2008/10/16 Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and relevant
> opinion, express it now? We don't have long to play with this if there's to
> be namespace support in 5.3.
Hi,
As far as I'm concerned, my preference goes to:
2. use a different
i guess i should note that Steph's tally only includes votes on Greg's
proposal. Stas proposal is obviously also still up for vote.
Yes, we're going to have to go head-to-head at some stage very soon. Getting
it down from 5 proposals to 2 would make that a bit more possible though.
In that s
On 16.10.2008, at 16:14, Steph Fox wrote:
Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and
relevant
opinion, express it now? We don't have long to play with this if
there's to
be namespace support in 5.3.
At present it looks like a two-horse race between #1 full
disambiguat
On 16 October 2008, at 16:14:34, Steph Fox wrote:
> Janusz Lewandowski #4 Yes
My alternative choice for A is #3.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 16 Oct 2008, at 16:14, Steph Fox wrote:
Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and
relevant
opinion, express it now?
Issue A: #1.
Issue B: Yes.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and relevant
opinion, express it now? We don't have long to play with this if there's to
be namespace support in 5.3.
At present it looks like a two-horse race between #1 full disambiguation
(:::) and #3 explicit disambiguation ('use name
