Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and relevant
opinion, express it now? We don't have long to play with this if there's to
be namespace support in 5.3.
At present it looks like a two-horse race between #1 full disambiguation
(:::) and #3 explicit disambiguation ('use namespace').
Method of tally: anything that would be acceptable to the voter gets a
point. (A weighted version is also offered here.)
D/S means 'with different separator'.
Name Issue A Issue B
======================================================
Greg #2 (alt #3, #1) Yes
Guilherme #3 Yes
Kalle #4 Yes
Tony Bibbs #3 Yes
Jaroslav Hanslik #1 (alt #3) Yes
Nathan Rixham #4 (D/S) N/A
Liz #1 or #3 Yes
Andrei - 'agreed with Gregs approach' N/A
Janusz Lewandowski #4 Yes
Steph #3 (alt #2) Abstained
Josh Davies - '#1 and #2 are functionally the same' N/A
Hannes - put in a plea for classes only in 5.3 N/A
Lester - WROTE SOMETHING LOUD N/A
Alexey #3 Yes
Marc Boeren #1 (D/S) N/A
Derick #1 No
Vesselin Kenashkov #3 Yes
Lars #3 (alt #2) N/A
Karsten Damberkalns #1 (alt #3) Yes
Jochem Maas #2 (alt #3, #1) Yes
Richard Quadling #1 (alt #2) No
Issue A:
#1 - 8 (1 with different separator)
#2 - 5
#3 - 11
#4 - 3 (1 with different separator)
Issue A weighted (first choice gets 2 points, rest 1):
#1 - 12 + 2 = 14
#2 - 4 + 3 = 7
#3 - 12 + 5 = 17
#4 - 6 + 0 = 6
Issue B:
Yes - 11
No - 2 (see Richard's rationale tho')
Abs - 1
N/A - 7
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
