Nickolai Nedovodiev wrote:
I am making PEAR Validate_RU with toggg
I confirm Nickolai's request.
He will need karma on pear Validate.
Thanks
--
toggg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Renato Formato wrote:
i need cvs karma for pear/Validate_IT. Bertrand Gugger (aka toggg) referred me.
I'm pleased to welcome Renato to lead together with me PEAR Validate_IT.
He needs karma on pear Validate
Grazie
--
toggg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubs
Bonsoir,
Antony Dovgal wrote:
Hello all.
I'd like to continue recent IRC discussion here, to draw more attention
to this issue.
At the moment functions fgets() and fgetss() are broken in HEAD, as they
return characters instead of , as they do in 5.2
(and I'm pretty sure this is the way the
bertrand Gugger wrote:
Michael Wallner wrote:
I'd therefore like to conduct a serious vote on this issue.
If my vote , in name of thousands poor hosted people could count.
[X] (+1) please remove that redundant strictness again
[ ] (-1) leave as it is, we need strict OO implementation
[
Michael Wallner wrote:
I'd therefore like to conduct a serious vote on this issue.
If my vote , in name of thousands poor hosted people could count.
[X] (+1) please remove that redundant strictness again
[ ] (-1) leave as it is, we need strict OO implementation
[ ] ( 0) what the hell are you t
Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 16.08.2006 15:13, bertrand Gugger wrote:
Bonjour,
Pierre wrote:
Hello,
After having tested 5.2 and the new memory manager for a couple of
weeks, I notice a significant increase of the reported memory usage. As
a side effect, many applications reach the 8M memory
Bonjour,
Pierre wrote:
Hello,
After having tested 5.2 and the new memory manager for a couple of
weeks, I notice a significant increase of the reported memory usage. As
a side effect, many applications reach the 8M memory limit. It can be
a problem.
A good example is to compare the usage of a p
Bonjour,
As I'm just here to observe your decisions since PHP4 to PHP5 costed us
so much ,
could you give some precisions about how it will be for "method strict
signatures" ?
Thx
--
toggg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.p
Andi Gutmans wrote:
This is the system limit info:
http://linux.about.com/library/cmd/blcmdl2_setrlimit.htm
this 8M limit is linux ?
It has nothing to do with PHP.
The PHP limit is in the INI file and you can grep for that INI parameter in
PHP.
Sure , let us say there's no line memory_l
Andi Gutmans wrote:
There is no hardcoded counting. We either cound (--enable-memory-limit) or
we don't (i.e. we rely on the system limits)
Andi
-Original Message-
From: bertrand Gugger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
btw , could you and PHP archives the same , avoid to quote d
s for the kind answers.
--
toggg
Andi
-Original Message-
From: bertrand Gugger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 1:10 PM
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] does 16M give a counting overhead ?
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hi Bertrand,
The discussion
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hi Bertrand,
The discussion is on how and what we count, not on whether to count or not.
The quoted discussion is/was , this one is about the possibility to get
16M without counting.
If you count in 256KB increments instead of in byte increments then there's
less counting t
=php-dev&m=115400370218834
So I just ask if and how it is possible to get 16M without the counting
overhead.
--
toggg
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On 27-Jul-06, at 9:03 AM, bertrand Gugger wrote:
That may hear off topic , but how you enable something else than 8M *without*
getting this cou
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On 27-Jul-06, at 9:03 AM, bertrand Gugger wrote:
That may hear off topic , but how you enable something else than 8M
*without* getting this counting overhead ?
Eh? When you set a limit what are you trying to do? From my experience
most of the time this setting
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On 27-Jul-06, at 6:02 AM, Matt W wrote:
Something else I'd like to see changed... Does anyone think
memory_get_[peak_]usage() should *always* be available, regardless of
whether memory_limit is actually enabled? Using the Windows binaries at
least, I was devastated
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
The first release candidate of PHP 5.2.0 is finally out
cool thing
and the source packages can be found here:
http://downloads.php.net/ilia/php-5.2.0RC1.tar.bz2
(fa36d378f7f1fd547b881b6323ae2c60)
merci bien , we need it.
Given the long time it took to make this RC t
Matt W wrote:
Sure, but I was meaning , in so far you extend the functionality of
number_format , then you will need to extend the doc.
Some draft of this doc extension would be usefull , even in this test
phase and especially for "userland" people.
Oh, I see. I don't know anything about cha
Matt W wrote:
Nope, it's broken. :-)
Thx to confirm the report ,
It's old linux here , so maybe it's related.
I did a full report of the whole run-tests with the snap from 06:30 this
morning and this minimal build.
(attached for complements of info)
off topic:
As recommended (7 other fail
Matt W wrote:
Hi Andrei,
I see you applied my patch.
Testing with a php5.2-200607222030 snaps having
/* $Id: array.c,v 1.308.2.21.2.7 2006/07/22 16:58:39 andrei Exp $ */
Looks by me as the ext/standard/tests/array/array_combine.phpt fails
Is it by me ?
$ diff -W 60 -y --suppress-common-lines
Matt W wrote:
Hi,
Give some basic userland examples about what you propose to change,
please ...
(I guess these are a part of the .phpt)
In the .phpt file, it is userland code where you can see examples of how the
changes work. :-)
Sure, but I was meaning , in so far you extend the functionali
Matt W wrote:
Hi,
Haven't heard any opinions on these functionality changes... (Though I know
more significant things keep you busy!)
Do many other people use number_format()?? Wouldn't allowing thousands
separator as param #2 simplify things?
Any issues with the semantics of operation? Neg
bertrand Gugger wrote:
Bonsoir Matt,
Matt W wrote:
Hi,
Haven't heard any opinions on these functionality changes... (Though
I know
more significant things keep you busy!)
Do many other people use number_format()?? Wouldn't allowing thousands
separator as param #2 simplify th
Bonsoir Matt,
Matt W wrote:
Hi,
Haven't heard any opinions on these functionality changes... (Though I know
more significant things keep you busy!)
Do many other people use number_format()?? Wouldn't allowing thousands
separator as param #2 simplify things?
Any issues with the semantics of o
Jason Sweat wrote:
On 7/19/06, Alan Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for adding the namespace patch in :) - oh well I can always dream...
Regards
Alan
+1 dreamer ( and +1 annoying de-lurker voting because he thinks it is
american idol ;)
Regards,
Jason
Why ?
I got schoked when I saw
Sean Coates wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Why not just define your own custom error handler and have it filter out
the error messages that you don't want to see... To me this would seem
like a easier approach, i would be against adding a in-language filter
for this.
Inability to easily dete
Greg Beaver wrote:
There may be a language barrier issue here, as I see you are in France
and I am not in France and we are speaking English.
Don't use that
I don't blame you
(or anyone) for not knowing things about phar that are not available
(documentation, etc.), all I was saying is that the
Gwynne wrote:
> no attempt
would/should be made to calculate a hash based on anything other than
what the object is willing to call itself.
+1 here
oo people have a name for that.
and implement what's needed.
I'm surely out of talk , but please keep indexes scalar.
The toString way is anyway
Matthew C. Kavanagh wrote:
Pierre wrote:
On 5/27/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- bool array(array $array)
cehcks whether arra position is valid (e.g. like "key($array) !==
NULL")
I don't understand this one.
I think you have to listen to psychedelic music and take a
Bonsoir
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-0
I don't like it , but we can easily get over.
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1
We rarely use it, and I think alan's way is ok for those using it massively.
So
Bonsoir
Pierre wrote:
Why don't you ask for an access to the wiki and update this list there?
-- Pierre
You need access to that ?
--
toggg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Bonjour,
Greg Beaver wrote:
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
For every RC we already send an e-mail to about 12 projects asking them
to test their code against the release and let us know of any issues
that come up.
Sadly, this does not seem to work. Maybe because nobody
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello bertrand,
we already have an infrastructure that allows you to run tests.
Just do: make test
I forgot the point:
I said infrastucture as what would need php to be complete ,
with a minimal build (with nothing) 45% of the tests are skipped.
Anyway, unit tests are
Bonsoir
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello bertrand,
we already have an infrastructure that allows you to run tests.
Just do: make test
I guess I was aware of that,
even if I'm more used to the pear format of .phpt
make test is easy
reporting failing ones is not
I just told I would try
Regards
--
Bonsoir,
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Jared,
this is the first prodictive mail in this thread, we can easily
extend the .phpt system to have different expectations for different
versions of php. That was we can handle stuff that slightly changes
like spell correction in error messages and such.
Pierre wrote:
I forgot to mention how vicious such changes can be. Most of times the
related tests are "updated" in the same commit (or right after) to
follow the new behavior. Making nearly impossible to know about the
breakages without duplicating core tests in our apps. Also commit
messages or
Bonjour
Makoto Tanaka wrote:
I have a new PEAR package. So I wish to contribute.
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=362
module name : "Services_Hatena"
(the pear-group credentials)
Username: makoto
Funny thing , seems your mail got lost
PEAR::Services_Hatena package is real.
--
Brian Moon wrote:
Oh, you want an operator to do that? Does some other language have this
that we are wanting to copy here? Seems overly complicated to me. But,
so does a lot of things being added PHP these days.
As bash ${parameter:=word} ?
--
toggg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Develop
Can't you g(irl|uy)s install somewhere a right pool so people can simply
vote ?
With some identification, so you can sort out common people, registered,
core, etc... results ?
I mean for simple choices e.g. goto|jump|both,
otherwise, as was recently proposed, RFC are certainly nice and more
ef
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi,
Because of some confused people I reverted "break label" patch and post it
for discussion once again together with GOTO patch.
Please reviw and vote.
1) goto and break label
2) goto only (like C)
3) break label only (like Java)
4) nothing
My vote: (1) +0.5, (4) +0.
Steph Fox wrote:
I'm not concerned by the vote.
Please, Bertrand, the goto/labelled breaks discussions were held ad
infinitum last June, and back in December, and again more recently. The
_only_ concern now is the vote. Anything else will lead to so much noise
on here we can't hear ourselve
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi,
Because of some confused people I reverted "break label" patch and post it
for discussion once again together with GOTO patch.
Please reviw and vote.
1) goto and break label
2) goto only (like C)
3) break label only (like Java)
4) nothing
My vote: (1) +0.5, (4) +0.5
Bonjour,
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
There is no such thing as an official irc channel for PHP. We have
nothing to do with this.
-Rasmus
bertrand Gugger wrote:
Bonjour,
Can some english speaker translate me what I got on the official #php
on EFNet ?
Sorry, I'm french:
"you momma so
Bonjour,
Can some english speaker translate me what I got on the official #php on
EFNet ?
Sorry, I'm french:
"you momma so ugly when she sits on the beach cats try to burry her"
words I won't forget
a+
--
bertrand
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: ht
43 matches
Mail list logo
