ameter. While it's still possible to add that
to a static-only class, that would be more cumbersome and less correct
than instantiation (since the encoding is state, technically). My
apologies. Carry on ;-)
Tomas
> On 19 Sep 2012, at 08:39, Tomas Creemers wrote:
>
[snip]
>>
>
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
>
>
> 2012/9/19 Tomas Creemers
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> If this is going to be implemented as a class, what is the advantage
>> of instantiation for this? Unless I'm missing i
Hi all,
If this is going to be implemented as a class, what is the advantage
of instantiation for this? Unless I'm missing it, I would propose that
the functions are made static.
In other words, I would prefer this:
echo Escaper::escapeHtml('test');
over this:
$e = new Escaper;
echo $e->esc
is
conversion is not neccesarlily an error (and E_WARNING is just a
non-fatal error), the conclusion is that this conversion should
trigger an E_NOTICE.
Best regards,
Tomas Creemers
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
rom the current numbering scheme. Then again, the current
notation in the RFC might just be a typo :-)
Best regards,
Tomas Creemers
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
