On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Kris Craig wrote:
>
> What I'm referring to is the same kind of bugfixes/etc that go into new
> release candidates. I mean, we're still planning on having multiple
> release candidates before an actual release, right? If so, then obviously
> we'll need a way to c
This is a very similar process to what OpenStack uses, it seems to work
well for them.
They have a few guys on freenode in #openstack-infra that have shown
themselves more than willing to go into detail about their setup and its
pro/con's..
It would be worth asking them for their experience...
T
It's probably worth mentioning, to be fair to Reindl, that he can no longer
respond publically to this list..
Thanks,
Kiall
Sent from my phone.
On Apr 7, 2012 8:07 p.m., "Maciek Sokolewicz"
wrote:
> On 07-04-2012 03:10, John Crenshaw wrote:
>
> Seriously, if you're so angry that you can't even
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> You repeatly call people stupid, or "like a child" or "what terrible
> happened in your life" and that is *not* allowed behaviour here. If you
> (or anyone else for that matter) can't refrain from that, you have no
> place on this list.
>
>
Retry is a feature I would very much like to see...
While it's not stritcly necessary to implement in core, it makes the code
much cleaner..
Thanks,
Kiall
Sent from my phone.
On Apr 3, 2012 8:28 a.m., "reeze" wrote:
> If just for exception recovery how about implement ruby's retry ?
>
> http:/
LOL - Nice ;)
Thanks,
Kiall
Sent from my phone.
On Apr 2, 2012 7:42 a.m., "Charlie Somerville" <
char...@charliesomerville.com> wrote:
> April fools
>
>
> On Monday, 2 April 2012 at 4:41 PM, Eloy Bote Falcon wrote:
>
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > Maybe this is not the correct list to ask this, but w
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <
weierophin...@php.net> wrote:
>
> One thing I'll point out is that git-flow is a set of extensions and
> aliases for
> the git CLI.
I don't believe that is entirely accurate. git-flow is two things, both
sharing a single name.
git-flow
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Christopher Jones <
christopher.jo...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 1. I had fun with a couple of small git merges today. I was trying to
> use local clones as briefly outlined on irc by dsp.
Multiple clones for each branch will be *much **much* harder to manage from
May I suggest changing the error reporting value, that way we can stop
hearing about your damn code ;)
Seriously though, I doubt anyone has a guide like that.
I know I've always had E_STRICT enabled and honestly don't have the
slightest clue how to trigger a strict warning. When you develop with
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Drak wrote:
> [snip]
> Forcing pushes to one's own topic branches in one's own fork can be
> acceptable providing
> upstream maintainers know before merging (for example squashing some work
> after peer review), but not to the central repo without some exceptional
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Both provide something that a large number of people did not or do not
> want anything to do with.
>
I disagree - The majority of PHP developers I've discussed this with are
in favor of adding *something *like this. Do a majority want this? I
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Last time we looked into it we couldn't make a clean implementation of it
> that worked well. If anybody has good ideas about how to do it, please
> provide a patch.
Right - I don't claim, even for a moment, to have the slightly clue how
ea
(irb):16
from :0
irb(main):017:0>
irb(main):018:0* divide("2", "1")
executing finally clause
NoMethodError: undefined method `/' for "2":String
from (irb):3:in `divide'
from (irb):18
from :0
Thanks,
Kiall
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Kiall Mac
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Tom Boutell wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Kiall Mac Innes
> wrote:
> > Yes, You could abstract the try/catch into a new (and un-needed) function
> > to try and emulate the behavior of finally.. Unless, for example, you
> >
dd to complete the try {} catch {} finally
> {} template.
> My 2 cents.
>
> 2012/2/28 Richard Lynch :
> > On Tue, February 28, 2012 8:22 am, Kiall Mac Innes wrote:
> >> +1000
> >>
> >> This is a feature that I've always wanted in PHP, My main reason bei
+1000
This is a feature that I've always wanted in PHP, My main reason being to
reduce code duplication. eg
try {
$fh = fopen($filename);
// Do some work on the file + encounter an error.
throw new Exception();
} catch (Exception $e) {
// Log an error or something
} finally {
Hi John,
Ondřej (One of the Debian PHP maintainers) listed 5 or 6 reasons in the
initial email in this thread.
Honestly, I can't think of a good reason for Debian or anyone else to
include 3rd party patches, whatever the patches purpose, in the default PHP
packages.
I would argue that, if peopl
Surely you can detect which operating system you're running on, and have
PHP act accordingly?
(Note: on my phone, haven't read the link!)
Kiall
Sent from my mobile - Sorry for being short.
On Jan 26, 2012 10:08 a.m., wrote:
> Hi,
>
> from
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4303128/how-to-u
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
>
> 1. /dev/random and /dev/urandom are unavailable on Windows and
> cannot be fopen()¹ed in safe mode on *nix/nux
Safe mode has been deprecated for two and a half years.. Adding features to
work around its limitations is (IMO) a bad idea..
Can'
See inline.
Kiall
Sent from a mobile - sorry for being short!
On Aug 27, 2011 5:22 p.m., "Lester Caine" wrote:
>
> Richard Quadling wrote:
>>>
>>> Having current SVN-only contributors learn it might going to be quite a
challenge.
>>
>> That's me. And I am VERY used to TortoiseSVN - a visual too
Some others systems use something similar to syntax checking (ldap password
hashes).
Baisically, prefix a code to the serialized string to indicate what method
was used to serialize.
Eg no prefix, or $O$ for the old style.
Or $I$ for the igbinary syntax.
This has the advantage of allowing addit
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> I don't have a problem with DVCS, just with projects ploughing into using
> git a year ago when it was ( and still is ) not ready for those type of
> projects :(
>
I think you're talking about submodules not being ready - correct me if I'm
hand, Lester appears to be talking about developing sites with
PHP:
Lester Caine wrote:
> Kiall Mac Innes wrote:
>
>> The Drupal document referenced is not explaining "How to develop Drupal"
>> but rather "How to develop a drupal based site using git".
>
&g
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Actually they are talking about developing Drupal ...
>
The Drupal document referenced is not explaining "How to develop Drupal" but
rather "How to develop a drupal based site using git".
The section titled "Creating a Working
Branch"'s in
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Richard Riley wrote:
>
>> Its really simple.
>>
>> Use git.
>>
> And stick two fingers up at the windows developer base ;)
I admit I don't use windows often, but when I do, TortoiseGit has always
worked fine for me!
> It works, is fast an
Yes - Gerrit is what Typo3, CyanogenMod, OpenStack and of course, Android
are using...
The OpenStack guys have a good introduction on how to use Gerrit from a
developers point of view - http://wiki.openstack.org/GerritWorkflow
The CyanogenMod guys have a good introduction on how to use Gerrit AND
Hi David,
Think I may have spotted a mistake in the RFC:
Decentralized version control system have some drawbacks:
*... Snip .. *
no svn:externals, no svn:eol-style
Later on in the doc, you go into detail about submodules, and CRLF -> LF
support in both Git and Hg.
Thanks,
Kiall
On Sun,
Check the password method here:
https://github.com/kohana-minion/core/blob/develop/classes/minion/cli.php
It should do what you want on windows+linux..
Kiall
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> hi
>
> is there any way to request a password from a user without
> showing the
control ignore list and won't get checked in as part of the project.
>
> To me, that is as many lines of Apache rewrite that one would have had and
> it is as feature complete as Apache rewrite.
>
> -ralph
>
>
>
> On 7/11/11 6:46 AM, Kiall Mac Innes wrote:
>
>
Hiya,
I've been playing with the built-in server, and have some concerns over how
static assets are handled.
Currently, to run an application on the built-in server, we essentially need
to list out all the static assets that should be served directly from disk.
This is the opposite of what I beli
FPM is still new, and only just getting the experimental flag removed, now
is the only time to make any BC breaking cosmitic changes that will lead to
less confusion in the long run..
That said - I'm not sure about the diagnostics group name..
Maybe allow for both the old and new naming on 5.4 an
I tend to agree. A working out of the box configuration is no harder for
sysadmins needing to change it, and easier for developers to just install
and run..
Kiall
On Jul 2, 2011 7:00 p.m., "Rasmus Lerdorf" wrote:
>
> Why not just set it low as he suggested? That's what Apache and most web
> serv
32 matches
Mail list logo
