Hello Hannes,
Nothing is wrong, I presume. Ignorance on my part.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 7:50:47 AM, you wrote:
HM> Hi Jason
>> I've put together a simple test framework and a 18 test cases to
HM> Wha
Hello Marcus,
I've put together a simple test framework and a 18 test cases to
start with. It's a stand-alone system that should work correctly
on PHP 5 installs. Both CLI mode and Web Server mode work fine.
NOTE: The tests I wrote are only testing standard functionality. We
need to a
Hello Christian,
CS> Does anyone apart from me wonder why we need to bloat the language for
CS> an obscure feature like this? Please take a step back, take a deep
CS> breath, count to 10 and that's *really* what the PHP community has been
CS> waiting for.
Please consider that not everyone does t
Hello Marcus,
Is this correct?
private readable $abc;
- doesn't make sense.
protected readable $abc;
- sub-class can read, not write
- not visible outside class
public readable $abc;
- sub-class can read, and write
- outside class can read, not write
If not, please cl
Hello Andi,
Your request for edge condition research is an excellent one. We've
just been through a hellish couple weeks of QA failures (at my
company) which just *underscore* your point. The last thing any of
us needs is a broken PHP.
That being said, is there anything I can do to he
things would be finding an acceptable
ZS> name, since 'readonly' implies something which this variable isn't
ZS> (it's very much writable, from the right places). Maybe something
ZS> like 'visible' (of course preferably we need to find something that
ZS> be
Hello Marcus,
class x
{
public readonly $xyz;
protected readonly $abc;
}
Definitions:
- public readonly- outside class can only read, not write.
- protected readonly - subclass can only read, not write.
- private readonly - does not make sense - do not support.
Ho
.
I'm not talking about adding hundreds of new features, or turning
PHP into the next java. It's about real business cases.
It's not about what YOU WOULD NOT use, it's about what a lot of
people need.
--
Best regards,
Jason Garber mailto:[EMAIL
Best regards,
Jason Garber mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IonZoft, Inc.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello Rasmus,
RL> In 5.1 this now throws an E_STRICT instead of a warning. It is still a
RL> bad idea to pass a tempvar by reference, so yes, you should strive to
RL> write E_STRICT clean code.
At the possible expense of being blamed and flamed, I'll say it...
ifsetor($var, 'default') would go
Hello Zeev,
I'd be happy to do this. Do you want this placed in a function or
just sample code to post somewhere?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, March 6, 2006, 6:38:34 PM, you wrote:
ZS> A part of the decision was to supply the few line
Hello Andi,
I think the "sexy" syntax is a significant plus, even if associative
arrays were used in the implementation. Is it a complex thing to
implement?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, January 12, 2006, 6:44:59 PM, you wrote:
AG>
Hello Jared,
JW> PHP is all about using a simple means to an end and getting the job
JW> done. Named parameters makes coding easier, not harder.
Well stated.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
T
Hello Aidan,
I think named parameters would be a useful feature... I'll leave it
at that.
Here is a coding idea for you, in case you hadn't considered it...
function highlight($text=NULL, $needle=NULL, $strip_links=NULL, ...)
{
is_null($text) && $text = SOME DEFAULT VALUE;
i
Hello Mike,
Same at my company.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, November 30, 2005, 4:31:58 AM, you wrote:
MH> Just FYI, the lack of tags on all development projects at my company.
MH> Mike
MH> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:29:42 +0100
MH> Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello
Hello Sara,
Please explain what the difference is between nested classes, and
this type of namespacing?
If you scrapped namespace constants and functions, then all we have
left is classes. If it was looked at as nested classes, then we get
all the functionality with all the simplicity
Hello Zeev,
I would like to point out that PHP has been changing over the last
few years from a language that Rasmus used for his online resume to
an enterprise grade application development language. I've
personally watched it go from PHP3 -> PHP4 -> PHP5, and *much*
anticipate the fut
Hello,
I as a userland library author, would appreciate namespaces quite a
bit. Here is an idea:
namespace1..class()
$x = new MyApp..MemberOrder();
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saturday, November 26, 2005, 3:52:35 PM, you wrote:
GB>
of one, it
will do a little token-replacing before compiling it...
Is it technically doable?
Thanks guys.
--
Best regards,
Jason Garber mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
:
RL> Jason Garber wrote:
>> Hello boots,
>>
>> if(AppDevLevel == 'Production')
>> {
>> error_reporting(E_ALL);
>> }
>> else
>> {
>> error_reporting(E_ALL | E_STRICT);
>> }
>>
>> Why do
Hello boots,
if(AppDevLevel == 'Production')
{
error_reporting(E_ALL);
}
else
{
error_reporting(E_ALL | E_STRICT);
}
Why don't you implement something like this in your application -
then you CAN control what error level is used at the client site.
--
Best regards,
Hello Noah,
In general, the people who advocate writing this construct differently,
are missing the point.
ifsetor is NOT input filtering, it is not a complex, general purpose
do-everything construct, it is a simple replacement for
$x = (isset($ANY_var) ? $ANY_var : 'Default Value');
Hello,
I don't know if chiming in at this point has any merit, but here is
what I see.
We have many, many people in favor of goto and ifsetor. They see
much legit use for those constructs.
Then, we have others who say that it will result in spaghetti code.
This is a completely inval
er.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jason mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, June 6, 2005, 1:22:11 PM, you wrote:
SC> Jason Garber wrote:
>> If there was any way to accommodate this with userland PHP code, I
>> would have already done it. However it
Hello Andi,
I have to strongly disagree with your ifsetor() comment. the use
for ifsetor is in no way eliminated with filtering.
I write very clean code and have taught all my developers to write
very clean code. We run the latest stable PHP version with maximum
error reporting. We d
Hello,
-1
New implies "new". Use a factory.
Maybe we should add an old construct:
$object = old MyClass();
Just kidding :)
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, May 9, 2005, 10:30:56 AM, you wrote:
LP> I would like (for code cle
Hello,
Speaking of these matters, how about implementing functions within
interfaces?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, February 17, 2005, 5:46:08 PM, you wrote:
RK> Okay, I'll accept the "no" of course, but I am curious.. Is it an
RK> im
Hello Andi,
>>4) php 5.1 is aiming to increase performance and security => ifsetor
>>
>> It is nice and easy and fast...only it's name. Well guys come on that's
>> the stupiest reason to reject. The name is selfspeaking, you're all only
>> not so used to its name as you are with foreach for
Hello Andi,
>>However i'd like to see the 'ifsetor' or '?:' operator since it makes
>>many things much faster and easier to read.
AG> I am not sure if the security filter functions aren't enough because they
AG> will be used to gather and verify input which is the main purpose of
ifsetor.
AG> Al
ariable that
is set to NULL? Is there any way to tell if a variable isset and
is_null without generating an error?
It doesn't seem that this behavior is consistent with the meaning of
isset(), or the errors that are generated when a variable is not set.
Thanks.
--
Best
Hello Rasmus,
It seems that it should be marked as a depreciated feature IN PHP5,
but not excremental in PHP4. This would let everyone know what
the real deal is...
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, December 2, 2004, 12:04:41 PM, you wr
>> isset($arr[0]['id']) used to return false if $arr[0] is undefined, but
>> with the new VM it throws a warning.
Doesn't sound right to me either...
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SG> I'd call it bugish, since part of the point of isset() is that it
Hello,
Consider this: public function foo(MyClass $o)
If you allow null, false, or anything else, you must CHECK it before
using it or you will get a "calling a method on a non-object" first.
The whole point of having a type hint, from my point of view, is so
the majority of time I D
Hello Andi,
reset_exception_handler()
:)
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 5:40:34 PM, you wrote:
AG> I see Marcus has already attempted to fix this even though the bug report
AG> is still open.
AG> Marcus, what exactly
Hello,
Ergh. I also hope that it can easily be restored to work the way
it did, even if that was undocumented. The thought of looking
through ~ 5,000 php scripts before our upgrade is a bit overwhelming
:)
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fri
Hello Manuel,
After reading your motivations, it seems to me that you need
mod rewrite.
from: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_rewrite.html
"Welcome to mod_rewrite, the Swiss Army Knife of URL manipulation!
This module uses a rule-based rewriting engine (based on a
regular
) or something like that to the language to
>> facilitate this?
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Jason Garber mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> IonZoft, Inc.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
7;CLI') or something like that to the language to
facilitate this?
--
Best regards,
Jason Garber mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IonZoft, Inc.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello Antony,
Maybe this was assumed, but wouldn't this be a per-request flag,
rather than a global flag?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 10:18:29 AM, you wrote:
AD> Sounds nice: we should not call destructors after t
ay, September 6, 2004, 1:28:22 AM, you wrote:
MF> Jason Garber wrote:
>> This is an interesting point you bring up. When we have large
>> registration processes or similar multi-page forms, we write our
>> data array to a hidden field using.
>>
>> base6
Hello Harry,
This is an interesting point you bring up. When we have large
registration processes or similar multi-page forms, we write our
data array to a hidden field using.
base64_encode(serialize($aData))
and read it in with
unserialize(base64_decode($_POST['aData']))
pa
Hello Stuart,
Patch didn't come through...
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 3:50:30 PM, you wrote:
SD> Hi All,
SD> This is my first attempt at submitting a patch so please be gentle :).
SD> The feature requested in #2
Hello Zeev,
Makes sense to me.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, August 27, 2004, 3:26:25 AM, you wrote:
ZS> I would like to get some feedback about my suggestion to move away from the
ZS> simple 'experimental' status and dividing it into tw
Hello,
+1 on the array parameter. It's flexible, easy to document (as dan put
it), and should accommodate future options.
Also, throwing E_NOTICES would be good to notify you if you mis-type
something, and they can always be suppressed if you want to send an
"unsupported" option.
--
Best
Hello Dan,
The answer that you are looking for can be found on the Zend site:
http://www.zend.com/php5/articles/engine2-php5-changes.php#Heading13
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, August 13, 2004, 6:59:44 PM, you wrote:
DO> Hello.
DO>
Hello Matthew,
3/4 = (0*4)+3 --> 3%4 = 3
9/4 = (2*4)+1 --> 9%4 = 1
20/10 = (2*10)+0 --> 20%10 = 0
4 goes into 3 a total of ZERO times with a remainder of 3.
10 goes into 20 a total of TWO times with a remainder of 0.
Take a look at a standard (integer) long division p
Hello Marcus,
Can abstract methods be protected?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, August 5, 2004, 1:32:05 PM, you wrote:
MB> Hello Ferdinand,
MB> Thursday, August 5, 2004, 5:01:42 PM, you wrote:
>> Trying to write a singleton interface:
Hello,
ALthough I'm in support of a local scoped static GOTO, I did not see
myself using it much.
However, I find myself this afternoon implementing a huge
do { switch { case: break 2; } while (true) structure.
It would be much "cleaner" to use goto in this case.
--
Best regards,
J
onths to a date?
how do you get the day of week for a given date? These are the
types of functions that I am thinking of.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, August 2, 2004, 10:40:45 PM, you wrote:
GS> On Aug 2, 2004, at 10:36 PM, Jason
, you wrote:
WF> http://pecl.php.net/package-info.php?package=Date
WF> It's not in the core because it is still relatively young.
WF> Maybe in a future release...
WF> --Wez.
WF> On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:36:14 -0400, Jason Garber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello inte
3. If there is no good reason for not adding this set of functions
to the PHP core, what would be the method of designing an acceptable
set of functions?
PHP is a feature packed language, but it's strange that this does not
exist in the core. Thanks for your time.
--
Best re
ofessional" functionality as well.
Thanks for answering my question.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, July 30, 2004, 9:24:13 PM, you wrote:
AG> At 09:19 PM 7/30/2004 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
>>On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 21:16, Jason
Hello Andi,
Sorry for being unclear on this, but what is the exact definition of
an "execution block" in this context?
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, July 30, 2004, 9:08:09 PM, you wrote:
AG> Hi Jason,
AG> I think that in any
PG> [snip] i'm somewhat confuzzled why you, of all people, are advocating such
PG> mutilation of do-while(), which is *abuse* of the construct. mutilating one
PG> construct to emulate another construct, which won't be implemented because
PG> it could be abused and mutilated, just doesn't compute fo
Hello,
I think we should add an INI option:
php_newbie true|false
;)
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, July 29, 2004, 8:54:34 PM, you wrote:
AH> Sara Golemon wrote:
>>>do {
>>> .code...
>>> if (something) break;
>>> ...code.
Hello,
After thinking about it for a bit, I'm convinced. If goto can be
implemented so that it is fast, and does not adversely affect other
parts of PHP, by all means, do it.
Andrey, you've been very clear why you would not use it, but why do
you want me not to use it? I can think of
Hello Cristiano,
First, I'd like to say that a function of this type sounds useful.
It's one that I've wanted for some time, particularly for verifying
that an array has the correct keys when it is passed as a function
parameter.
If I understand what you are doing correctly, the same
Hello,
Perhaps we should implement one of the "read this obscure image and
type the number into this text box" scheme into all the bug post and
update forms?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, July 20, 2004, 11:57:25 AM, you wrote:
US> Th
Hello Curt,
From http://us2.php.net/manual/en/language.operators.assignment.php
"The value of an assignment expression is the value assigned.
That is, the value of "$a = 3" is 3."
I take this to mean that ($foo->a = 'bar') will always return 'bar'
and that is a core feature of the languag
Hello PHPers,
On behalf of all 19 of us here at IonZoft, I'd like to add to this
letter by saying thank you for providing the *excellent* tool that
allows us to make our livelihood this way.
PHP 5.0 is a unparalleled release of not only PHP, not only open
source, but of great software i
MR> $level = value($_POST['level'], NULL, INT);
MR> switch($level){
MR> case 0:
MR> echo "Welcome to level 0";
MR> break;
MR> case 1:
MR> echo "Welcome to level 1";
MR> break;
MR> case 2:
MR> echo "Welcome to level 2";
MR> break;
MR> default:
MR> echo "That level is in
>>
>> The problem with default() is that there will be tons of scripts out
>> there
>> that will be broken by this. Hence i'd like to see a more non intuitive
>> name (like the ifsetor). Probably getvalue() was the best compromise so
>> far.
GS> what was wrong with nvl() (of oracle fame)?
ifset(
AG> How about default($var, expr)?
I like it.
-Jason
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Sunday, July 11, 2004, 10:48:06 PM, you wrote:
RL> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Jason Garber wrote:
>> The concept is desirable, but can be achieved if you need it just as
>> simply using already available syntax (ie a cast):
>>
>> $level = (integer) value($_SESSION['le
Hello,
RL> $a = value($_GET['index'], $default);
value() sounds like more like a "language construct" to me. I'm not
sure if it accurately conveys the meaning though (not that it has
stopped other functions from being added in the past :)
--
Best regards,
Jasonm
Hello Marc,
MR> I don't think a function named param() really fits, but I do like the
MR> idea of adding a type check (or in the case of PHP a type cast) to the
MR> function.
MR> $level = (int) (isset($_SESSION['level']) ? $_SESSION['level'] :
MR> (isset($_REQUEST['level']) ? $_REQUEST['level']
Sorry,
The actual bug is http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29080
29081 is a duplicate
-Jason
At 7/9/2004 05:16 PM -0400, Jason Garber wrote:
Bug #29081 Segmentation Fault when using Interface
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29081
-Jason
At 7/9/2004 01:30 PM +0200, you wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004
Bug #29081 Segmentation Fault when using Interface
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29081
-Jason
At 7/9/2004 01:30 PM +0200, you wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Jason Garber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I discovered this problem tonight while working on a new PHP 5 class that
> uses an interfac
] Jason]$ php -f Interface.php
Hello
--
Could it be a problem with the Debugger?
Thanks,
Jason Garber
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Sure,
Any recommendations?
-Jason
At 7/9/2004 09:12 AM +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Jason,
could you do something about your mail client? It strips off or cuts the
mail id so that mail threads loose their connection for all of us.
regards
marcus
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mail
d) have a short, concise, CLEAR name
Comments?
Sincerely,
Jason Garber
At 7/8/2004 07:48 PM -0400, you wrote:
Jason Garber wrote:
The original reason that I asked for this functionality was to make it
significantly easier to work with E_ALL error reporting. When I say
easier, I mean by reducing
't know what sort
of Zend license I'd require to be able to distribute free pre-compiled code.
http://pecl.php.net
I am also an experience C/C++ programmer and can write these functions
myself. Before doing so, though, I'd like to know if I should bother.
Would they make it into P
on() syntax? There has
been quite a few reasons stated against the operator syntax, but I haven't
heard any reason why we should not go with the function() syntax?
Sincerely,
Jason Garber
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi Marc,
At 7/7/2004 09:06 PM -0400, Marc Richards wrote:
Jason Garber wrote:
Hi Marc,
What we basically settled on was to use this syntax (as a new language
construct):
$x = ifsetor(mixed variable, mixed default);
So ?: is out then? Or just delayed until it can be tackled.
Who am I to say it&#
iting for it also :)
Sincerely,
Jason Garber
At 7/7/2004 08:26 PM -0400, Marc Richards wrote:
On 4/15/2004 Jason Garber asked about a new language construct to simplify
testing if a variable isset() and assinging a default value for those that
aren't. The thread title was "Construct Requ
rays, it's simple to define default
parameters.
function foo($aArgs)
{
$aArgs += array('SomeID' => 0, 'DoThat' => TRUE);
}
Required keys can even be checked for with a quick array_diff().
For the amount of times that it would *probably* be used, I don't think
it&#x
everything went fine as i misstyped today using 5.0.0rc3 :-)
--red
Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Jason Garber wrote:
Is being able to have a comma at the END of an array definition a supported
feature, or an undocumented feature that should not be used?
If I rememb
Thanks for the good explanation.
~Jason
At 6/17/2004 02:10 PM +0200, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
Joseph Lee wrote:
I guess "exit();" terminates execution within itself without returning
to the caller, so that is no chance of getting a runtime error.
parse error != runtime error
but language construct
Hello,
In PHP4 and PHP5 the following syntax works fine (note the last comma):
array
(
1 => 'bob',
2 => 'sam',
);
Is being able to have a comma at the END of an array definition a supported
feature, or an undocumented feature that should not be u
That's what I figured. throw is a language construct.
However, from the manual (http://php.net/exit):
void exit ( int status)
Note: This is not a real function, but a language construct.
Why does
$x || exit;
work without a parse error?
Thanks,
Jason Garber
At 6/17/2004 10:22 AM
Consider the following:
$x = FALSE;
$x || throw new exception('Some Assertion');
I get the following Parse Error:
error: parse error, unexpected T_THROW in /home/.../Z_Record.php on line 153
However, this code produces no errors..
$x = FALSE;
$x || exit;
Why is this?
Thanks,
Jason Gar
to
the fullest.
Sincerely,
Jason Garber
President
IonZoft, Inc.
At 6/15/2004 06:30 PM +0300, you wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:47:29 +0200 (CEST), Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Alexander Valyalkin wrote:
Today I checked file /win32/readdir.c
Below you can vi
To add..
The 18 of us here at IonZoft wish to thank all members of the PHP team and
everyone who has helped make it happen. We have built a fast growing
company totally focused on solutions based on PHP, and are very excited
about the release of PHP5.
Thanks!
Jason Garber
At 6/7/2004 09:51 PM
on
the $oDB object still being usable. How can this be structured to ensure
that the DB object does not get released first?
Thanks,
Jason
__________
Jason Garber
President & Chief Technology Officer
IonZoft, Inc.
814.742.8030 :: [EM
k that earlier in July would be better, so that we don't
have to wait too much longer before we branch 5.1. Maybe July 4? :)
Zeev
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
___
It may be worth noting the way MySQL AB has been rolling out MySQL. They
released 4.0.0 as a restructured release, did bug fixes and small changes
up through 4.0.19, and are approaching the release of 4.1 with significant
new features. It sounds like the same might apply here.
~Jason
At 5/18/
Consider this below:
At 5/11/2004 03:23 PM +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 11:44 AM 5/11/2004 +0200, Timm Friebe wrote:
On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 18:16, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I think it's hard to put closure on this type hints issue.
[...]
> As no good syntax has been found for the less common case of a
nt to allow NULL's not use type hints at
all..."
+1
______
Jason Garber
President & Chief Technology Officer
IonZoft, Inc.
814.742.8030 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://IonZoft.com
__
e used very simply, but
still has the low-level power to accommodate all the other things that one
wishes to accomplish. Let's keep it that way.
__________
Jason Garber
President & Chief Technology Officer
IonZoft, Inc.
814.742.8030 :: [EMAIL
I would view implicit array creation as a slightly negative thing, similar
to accessing the value of a variable that does not exist.
We run in E_ALL mode and write our code to avoid all E_NOTICEs. For
instance, before using an array, I always initialize it using $aItems =
array();
I'm in favo
/)
{=B0_=B0)
() ()
( )( )
', 'barfoo');
echo constant('
(\ /)
{=B0_=B0)
() ()
( )( )
') . chr(10); // outputs : bar
Is it a feature or a bug ? :)
Mehdi Achour
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
_
& width == 768
but the html for that is Height ==
document.write(screen.width); & width ==
document.write(screen.height);
and i wanne work with the 1024 in php and not with the html ,, what can
i do to
run the javascript at server side and not on the client side
--
PHP Internals - PHP R
Hi,
One of the questions that I have is "how long is long?". Here is an
interesting example of a large system that I work on.
On the first line of each script, we have a line like:
require_once('izfc.core4.php'); //exists in global include path
The job of that script is to find and include all
Just a note,
Would "Object" be more appropriate than "Class"? The expected variable
type is an object (defined by a class), and the gettype() function returns
'object'..
# php -r '$x=new stdclass(); var_dump(gettype($x));'
string(6) "object"
It may mean adding a new reserved word though.
~Jas
If it makes any difference...
I would say no way to multi method dispatch. PHP, in my understanding, was
a loosely typed language, and this is straining against that very
concept. In the rare case that one needs multi-method dispatch, they can
use a format such as:
class xyz
{
public fun
2:36:55 AM, you wrote:
Jason Garber wrote:
In our code, you will find many blocks looking like
$CUST_ID = (integer) (isset($_POST['CUST_ID']) ? $_POST['CUST_ID'] : 0);
so how is that different from
$CUST_ID = (integer) @$_POST['CUST_ID'];
@ is damn slow
--
Can y
gan the ifsetor() discussion...
~Jason
At 4/17/2004 02:44 AM +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Alan,
Saturday, April 17, 2004, 2:36:55 AM, you wrote:
> Jason Garber wrote:
>> In our code, you will find many blocks looking like
>>
>> $CUST_ID = (integer) (isset($_POST
In our code, you will find many blocks looking like
$CUST_ID = (integer) (isset($_POST['CUST_ID']) ? $_POST['CUST_ID'] : 0);
$CONTACT_ID = (integer) (isset($_POST['CONTACT_ID']) ? $_POST['CONTACT_ID']
: 0);
And when you want to read an element from an array that may or may not
exist, you see th
Good call.
At 4/17/2004 01:17 AM +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I don't want to spoil the party but:
a) I don't think we should add a new reserved word for this. I will try
and think of an alternative which uses the existing vocabulary.
b) I would not want to add this before releasing PHP 5.0.0. I th
Chris -
As Wez pointed out, this is almost ready to insert into the parser. Most
of yesterdays conversation was spent hashing out the ways that this should
be implemented.
Remember, one of the biggest reasons for creating this function was so that
E_NOTICE would not be issued when attempting
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
