On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Christoph Becker wrote:
>
> try {
> require $fileName;
> } catch (Error $e) {
> echo "Oops, maybe deleted? " . $e;
> }
> functionDefinedInFileName();
If anyone chooses to write this kind of code, then let them figure out
why their f
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Florian Anderiasch
wrote:
> Additionally, it's either semantically wrong to group unrelated
> functions in "static tool classes", it's even a well-known antipattern.
It also doesn't address a point made by Igor before:
"It's distracting to have my vendor name
