On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Florian Anderiasch <m...@anderiasch.de> wrote:
> Additionally, it's either semantically wrong to group unrelated > functions in "static tool classes", it's even a well-known antipattern. It also doesn't address a point made by Igor before: "It's distracting to have my vendor name in there every time they call the function. They can alias it, but then they just need to come up with a random word that makes no sense." The difference being that now it's not a vendor name but a class name. Alexander
