Re: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-Dev] Versioned Packagers (Iteration IV)

2024-07-06 Thread Michael Morris
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 2:12 AM Mike Schinkel wrote: > On Jul 5, 2024, at 1:47 PM, Michael Morris wrote: > I went to sleep thinking about this post, on import maps in general and > how Composer works, specifically when you use a class map instead of the > PSR-0 or PSR-4 schemes. In that mode, Co

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Improve language coherence for the behaviour of offsets and containers

2024-07-06 Thread Jakob Givoni
On Thu, Jul 4, 2024, 15:54 Gina P. Banyard wrote: > Hello internals, > > I would like to formally open the discussion on an RFC I've been working > on for the past year: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/container-offset-behaviour > > Hi Gina, 100% support for this proposal from me! What a gold mine o

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]I'd like to see the RFCs that deprecate the FFI non-static approach start voting

2024-07-06 Thread John Coggeshall
> That being said, I support your RFC. It seems like a better solution than > mine. However, I would ask you to change your tone to be less offensive, > because rudeness is not a welcomed behavior on the mailing list, and by the > way, we have the same ultimate goal of improving PHP, even if you

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]I'd like to see the RFCs that deprecate the FFI non-static approach start voting

2024-07-06 Thread Niels Dossche
On 06/07/2024 11:55, Saki Takamachi wrote: > Hi, > >>> The reason I'm not so polite is because I'm so angry. Firstly, the >>> Deprecate functions with overloaded signatures RFC's approach to FFI >>> recommendations is unfounded, and secondly, the PR >>> commit(https://github.com/php/php-src/

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]I'd like to see the RFCs that deprecate the FFI non-static approach start voting

2024-07-06 Thread Máté Kocsis
I am the author of that "stupid" commit and RFC ( https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecate_functions_with_overloaded_signatures#fficast_ffinew_and_ffitype ) which you are referring to. I can understand that you are unhappy about the outcome of the RFC, but I would have happily incorporated your feedback

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]I'd like to see the RFCs that deprecate the FFI non-static approach start voting

2024-07-06 Thread Jordan LeDoux
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 1:09 AM chopins xiao wrote: > The reason I'm not so polite is because I'm so angry. Firstly, the > Deprecate functions with overloaded signatures RFC's approach to FFI > recommendations is unfounded, and secondly, the PR commit( > https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/4acf

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]I'd like to see the RFCs that deprecate the FFI non-static approach start voting

2024-07-06 Thread Saki Takamachi
Hi, >> The reason I'm not so polite is because I'm so angry. Firstly, the >> Deprecate functions with overloaded signatures RFC's approach to FFI >> recommendations is unfounded, and secondly, the PR >> commit(https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/4acf0084dcd63ec369a610ec966db33f322694c8) >>

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]I'd like to see the RFCs that deprecate the FFI non-static approach start voting

2024-07-06 Thread Saki Takamachi
Hi, > The reason I'm not so polite is because I'm so angry. Firstly, the Deprecate > functions with overloaded signatures RFC's approach to FFI recommendations > is unfounded, and secondly, the PR > commit(https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/4acf0084dcd63ec369a610ec966db33f322694c8) > has

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]I'd like to see the RFCs that deprecate the FFI non-static approach start voting

2024-07-06 Thread chopins xiao
The reason I'm not so polite is because I'm so angry. Firstly, the Deprecate functions with overloaded signatures RFC's approach to FFI recommendations is unfounded, and secondly, the PR commit(https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/4acf0084dcd63ec369a610ec966db33f322694c8) has not been voted o