On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:02 PM Levi Morrison
wrote:
> Some of the RFC authors have been discussing this a lot based on
> feedback. In a [previous message][1] I said we would message the list
> when it's ready for re-review. It's still not ready, but we seem to be
> driving towards consensus.
>
> I don't know what the answer is here, I'm reading through the entire thread
> and RFC again and trying to better formulate in my mind how I'd [like to]
> reason about this in terms of syntax. But the more I think about it, the
> more I realise much as I loved the idea when I first read the RFC, n
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:51 PM Rowan Tommins
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Did you see my message yesterday about the two mental models of the
> feature? https://externals.io/message/114157#114492
>
> Your expectation there is in line with the "start with an empty closure
> and add things" model; the b
Hi David,
On 18/05/2021 20:56, David Gebler wrote:
function foo(int $a, int $b, int ...$p) { ... }
$partial = foo(?, 10);
$partial(5, 15, 25);
Intuitively, because the existing convention is extra unused parameters in
user defined functions are silently ignored, I think I would expect the
abov
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:45 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> User-space functions have always accepted more arguments than they're
> defined with. They just get dropped off the end silently, unless you use
> func_get_args() or variadics. While I know not everyone likes that
> "feature", it means tha
On 18/05/2021 17:19, Go Kudo wrote:
I have created a draft of the RFC.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rng_extension
Hi,
At a glance, I think this looks like a good clear approach.
I think deprecating mt_srand makes sense, but could do with a heading to
make sure it's not overlooked, and include
Hi Go Kudo,
I think this proposal is much better than the one before. I believe we need
such functionality in PHP.
I have some questions I would like you to consider:
1. I'm still not a fan of exposing the algorithms as separate classes in
PHP. Their names are confusing and I don't see how exposin
Hello internals.
I have created a draft of the RFC.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rng_extension
This RFC is a proposal to implement the old object scope RNG in PHP.
You can read about the discussion so far below.
- https://externals.io/message/114378
- https://externals.io/message/112819
I believe
On Mon, May 17, 2021, at 11:14 PM, Paul Crovella wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 4:44 PM Aaron Piotrowski wrote:
> >
> > My issue is the dual-meaning of ? in the current proposal. In `foo(?, 42)`,
> > the ? represents a single argument, but adding a trailing ? (such as in
> > `foo(?, 42, ?)`) r
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 1:23 AM Gabriel Caruso
wrote:
> On Sun, 16 May 2021, 15:52 Máté Kocsis, wrote:
>
> > As I've fully finished the implementation, I intend to bring this to a
> vote
> > on Wednesday if no new concerns come up (besides the usual question about
> > the usefulness of the featu
10 matches
Mail list logo
