I really like this. But the name "friend" sounds strange. Is not possible
think about alternative names? Maybe "accessible from X" or "allow X".
Em sex, 6 de jul de 2018 17:25, Dustin Wheeler escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> I've let this RFC linger for a long time and finally wrapped up the
> remaining a
Le jeu. 21 juin 2018 à 19:37, Nicolas Grekas
a écrit :
> if ((new ReflectionReference($array[$key]))->getRefcount() > 2) { /* is
>> ref */ } else { /* not a ref */ }, for computing the allowed types you’d
>> intersect the types of the ReflectionProperties returned by
>> getReferencingProperties()
On 06.07.2018 at 21:35, Sara Golemon wrote:
>> It's up to a combination of internals@ opinion, and RM best-judgement.
>> I for one, see no issue with pushing FF out (we can do an alpha4, even
>> an alpha5). On the other end we have the option of reducing the
>> number of RCs, or pushing GA by the
Hello,
I've let this RFC linger for a long time and finally wrapped up the
remaining administrative items to put it to vote. This has been
discussed a few times in the past:
https://externals.io/message/89732
https://externals.io/message/90311
I would like to open the vote for an RFC to support
> It's up to a combination of internals@ opinion, and RM best-judgement.
> I for one, see no issue with pushing FF out (we can do an alpha4, even
> an alpha5). On the other end we have the option of reducing the
> number of RCs, or pushing GA by the same delay. FTR; I'd favor
> pushing GA out ove
On 06.07.2018 at 15:55, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Christoph M. Becker
> wrote:
>
>> While trying to put together a patch to make PECL/uopz compatible with
>> PHP 7.3[1], I've stumbled upon commit ca035f2[2] and commit 1a63fa6[3].
>> The former removed Z_CACHE_SLOT and
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Christoph M. Becker
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While trying to put together a patch to make PECL/uopz compatible with
> PHP 7.3[1], I've stumbled upon commit ca035f2[2] and commit 1a63fa6[3].
> The former removed Z_CACHE_SLOT and related stuff, but the latter
> reintroduced
Hi!
While trying to put together a patch to make PECL/uopz compatible with
PHP 7.3[1], I've stumbled upon commit ca035f2[2] and commit 1a63fa6[3].
The former removed Z_CACHE_SLOT and related stuff, but the latter
reintroduced it with an apparently somewhat different meaning. If that
is correct, t
