Any objections if I add an extra output to run-tests.php?
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2515
I'm working on some CI stuff and a machine readable output would be
handy. '-w' is nice for a list of failed tests, but I want to know all
dispositions, not just failures. I considered going for a
>
>
> >
> > I gave one use case in an earlier message: many serialisation formats
> have
> > a different form for ordered lists vs key-value pairs. As an obvious
> > example, look at JSON arrays and objects, and many other formats have
> > similar types.
> >
>
> Ah, so you would do something like
>
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Rowan Collins
wrote:
> On 5 May 2017 22:19:51 BST, Ryan Pallas wrote:
> >I just read this thread and am wondering what exactly is the use case?
> >Like
> >are you going to do something if it is vector-like, and do something
> >different (or not do anything at all)
On 5 May 2017 22:19:51 BST, Ryan Pallas wrote:
>I just read this thread and am wondering what exactly is the use case?
>Like
>are you going to do something if it is vector-like, and do something
>different (or not do anything at all) if it's not vector-like? I mean,
>if
>you have to crawl it, and
> Also, given the implementation above, why does the array have to be
ksorted
> correctly to count? Specifically, why isn't this array considered vector
> like?
> $arr = [
> 1=> 1,
> 0=> 0,
> ];
I suppose the question would be, given that array (or a similar
out-of-order array), should is_
