Hello, dear coders.
I'm using php for a year and it's being my favourite language. Also I'm
using some bookkeping languages which is based on php syntax but ';' on the
end of the line is not neccesary on it.
So I can't understand why syntax needs symbol ';' on the end of every line,
if it also ends
Hello, dear coders.
I'm using php for a year and it's being my favourite language. Also I'm
using some bookkeping languages which is based on php syntax but ';' on the
end of the line is not neccesary on it.
So I can't understand why syntax needs symbol ';' on the end of every line,
if it also ends
Hello, dear coders.
I'm using php for a year and it's being my favourite language. Also I'm
using some bookkeping languages which is based on php syntax but ';' on the
end of the line is not neccesary on it.
So I can't understand why syntax needs symbol ';' on the end of every line,
if it also ends
On 29/3/17 2:11 am, Sara Golemon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Joe Watkins wrote:
With the first alpha of 7.2 due in early June, we think it's time to start
the process of finding and electing release managers for the next minor
release of PHP.
We are looking for two souls to take o
Results for project PHP master, build date 2017-03-29 15:11:30-07:00
commit: a7c6948
previous commit:bf673d3
revision date: 2017-03-29 00:20:52+02:00
environment:Haswell-EP
cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores,
stepping 2, LLC 45 MB
Hi!
> I heard that the named_params RFC[1] was mostly done but needed a
Was it? The RFC seems to be last edited about 3 years ago and I don't
remember much discussion on it since. Given that it targeted 5.6, it's
probably way out of date and also last time I remember it lacked
consensus on the sy
Hi,
I heard that the named_params RFC[1] was mostly done but needed a
big grunt work to check the param names of all the functions in the
standard library. (and change those that aren't good enough)
So I'm interested in taking a look at it to see if I have the skills to
push it forward.
But the
Am 29.03.17 um 12:52 schrieb Christoph M. Becker:
> On 28.03.2017 at 23:49, Thomas Punt wrote:
>
>> There doesn't appear to be a status quo on what to do with bug reports
>> targeting
>>
>> PECL extensions that seem completely unmaintained (i.e. no releases in many
>> years -
>>
>> such as bug r
On 28.03.2017 at 23:49, Thomas Punt wrote:
> There doesn't appear to be a status quo on what to do with bug reports
> targeting
>
> PECL extensions that seem completely unmaintained (i.e. no releases in many
> years -
>
> such as bug reports for the SAM extension[1][2]). Would anyone have any
