Am 29.03.17 um 12:52 schrieb Christoph M. Becker: > On 28.03.2017 at 23:49, Thomas Punt wrote: > >> There doesn't appear to be a status quo on what to do with bug reports >> targeting >> >> PECL extensions that seem completely unmaintained (i.e. no releases in many >> years - >> >> such as bug reports for the SAM extension[1][2]). Would anyone have any >> objections >> >> if I closed such reports with a "Won't Fix," given their abandoned status? I >> know Kalle >> >> has tagged some of these bug reports with "Suspended," but given the >> unlikeliness >> >> of these extensions ever being revived, it seems unnecessary to keep such bug >> >> reports lying around in the bugs DB.
From my POV I'd only ask for a "template-comment" along the line of "As
the extension isn't maintained since <inser year> there won't be a fix
for this issue. We're therefore closing it now."
Apart from that I'm fine with it :)
My 0.02€
Cheers
Andreas
--
,,,
(o o)
+---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+
| Andreas Heigl |
| mailto:andr...@heigl.org N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" |
| http://andreas.heigl.org http://hei.gl/wiFKy7 |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| http://hei.gl/root-ca |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
