Hi,
The question is in the subject. Is someone currently responsible for
phar maintenance and evolution ?
From what I see in history, it seems noone is actively working on it
but I'd like it to be confirmed. I don't want to take it over atm
because what I have in mind still requires a lot of
I've reworked your patch https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1662
Actually, you patch was really good. I just re-factored one base
data-structure "mistake" and fixed another obvious mistake in reflection.
Anyway, this needs to be re-viewed by others. I'll do it myself on next
week :)
Thanks. Dmitr
Hi Florian,
Florian Anderiasch wrote:
On 04.12.2015 19:01, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Am 04.12.2015 um 18:53 schrieb Florian Anderiasch:
I hate to say it, but not providing an official Windows build is kind of
sticking the finger to everyone using Windows for PHP (not the language)
development.
On 4 December 2015 at 08:01, Martin Keckeis wrote:
> About imagick i found just this on gophp7
> https://github.com/gophp7/gophp7-ext/wiki/ext-imagick
>
> Are there still problems, or do they just need to be rebuild?
>
Imagick needed the 7 dev branch merging to master and tagging.
Downloads that
Stanislav, Anthony:
Okay, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't overlooking an unintended
behavior. I'm going to continue using \explicit_prefixing().
http://userjac.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/haters-gonna-hate-cool-dog.jpg
Scott Arciszewski
Chief Development Officer
Paragon Initiative Enterpr
Hi!
> It has been brought to my attention that my consistent use of \ prefixing
> of global functions is an eyesore, but I've got a simple little PoC that
> shows why I do it, and now I'm wondering if the behavior I'm working around
> should qualify as a PHP bug?
No, it's not a bug, it is a featu
On 04.12.2015 19:01, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Am 04.12.2015 um 18:53 schrieb Florian Anderiasch:
>> I hate to say it, but not providing an official Windows build is kind of
>> sticking the finger to everyone using Windows for PHP (not the language)
>> development.
>
> Sorry, but that does not
On Dec 5, 2015 1:01 AM, "Sebastian Bergmann" wrote:
>
> Am 04.12.2015 um 18:53 schrieb Florian Anderiasch:
> > I hate to say it, but not providing an official Windows build is kind of
> > sticking the finger to everyone using Windows for PHP (not the language)
> > development.
>
> Sorry, but that
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Sebastian Bergmann
wrote:
> Am 04.12.2015 um 18:53 schrieb Florian Anderiasch:
> > I hate to say it, but not providing an official Windows build is kind of
> > sticking the finger to everyone using Windows for PHP (not the language)
> > development.
>
> Sorry, bu
Am 04.12.2015 um 18:53 schrieb Florian Anderiasch:
> I hate to say it, but not providing an official Windows build is kind of
> sticking the finger to everyone using Windows for PHP (not the language)
> development.
Sorry, but that does not explain the special treatment of Windows.
Red Hat provi
On 04.12.2015 11:29, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Am 04.12.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Stanislav Malyshev:
>> Windows as a platform is different from Linux/Mac in several aspects
>
> True. But why does the PHP Project have to provide Windows binaries on
> php.net? Microsoft should be treated as any oth
Scott,
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It has been brought to my attention that my consistent use of \ prefixing
> of global functions is an eyesore, but I've got a simple little PoC that
> shows why I do it, and now I'm wondering if the behavior I'm working ar
Hi,
It has been brought to my attention that my consistent use of \ prefixing
of global functions is an eyesore, but I've got a simple little PoC that
shows why I do it, and now I'm wondering if the behavior I'm working around
should qualify as a PHP bug?
https://3v4l.org/po925
Scott Arciszewski
On 4 December 2015 at 13:54, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 04/12/15 10:29, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> >> Windows as a platform is different from Linux/Mac in several aspects
> > True. But why does the PHP Project have to provide Windows binaries on
> > php.net? Microsoft should be treated as any ot
Hi Guys,
Please ignore the results bellow. We identified some issues in our measurement
platform and result validation methodology. Now we try to solve them for
reducing risks of other misleading numbers.
We hope to resume daily build measurements on Monday 07.
And Warm Congratulations for 7.0
On Dec 4, 2015 8:25 PM, "Jan Ehrhardt" wrote:
>
> Martin Keckeis in php.internals (Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:01:20 +0100):
> >it seems there are already some extensions build successfully for
> >php7windows
> >
> >in my case i miss currently two extensions:
> >- https://pecl.php.net/package/imagick
> >-
On 04/12/15 10:29, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>> Windows as a platform is different from Linux/Mac in several aspects
> True. But why does the PHP Project have to provide Windows binaries on
> php.net? Microsoft should be treated as any other downstream vendor: let
> them build their binaries on
Martin Keckeis in php.internals (Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:01:20 +0100):
>it seems there are already some extensions build successfully for
>php7windows
>
>in my case i miss currently two extensions:
>- https://pecl.php.net/package/imagick
>- https://pecl.php.net/package/APCu
>
>About imagick i found just
On Dec 4, 2015 5:28 PM, "Sebastian Bergmann" wrote:
>
> Am 04.12.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Stanislav Malyshev:
> > Windows as a platform is different from Linux/Mac in several aspects
>
> True. But why does the PHP Project have to provide Windows binaries on
> php.net? Microsoft should be treated as
Am 04.12.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Stanislav Malyshev:
> Windows as a platform is different from Linux/Mac in several aspects
True. But why does the PHP Project have to provide Windows binaries on
php.net? Microsoft should be treated as any other downstream vendor: let
them build their binaries on
2015-09-11 23:13 GMT+02:00 Jan Ehrhardt :
> Joe Watkins in php.internals (Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:25:22 +0100):
> >I thought vc14 deps were just copied from somewhere else, that's what
> I
> >did to test ?
> >
> >Does that mean no dlls for now ?
> >
> >Any time is good, you have more impor
21 matches
Mail list logo
