On 19/10/15 21:43, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
(...)
If you have a keyspace of 2^32 possible output sequences like we do
from rand(), we can say that after 65,536 there is a 50% probability
of finding at least one collision.
It should go without saying, but if users have weak/common password
choic
On 10/19/15 3:43 PM, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Chris Riley wrote:
On 19 October 2015 at 16:22, Tom Worster wrote:
On 10/18/15 7:39 PM, Ángel González wrote:
Korvin wrote:
+1 for 7.0.x security patch release, best effort sounds scary.
This is a salt. It d
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Chris Riley wrote:
> On 19 October 2015 at 16:22, Tom Worster wrote:
>
>> On 10/18/15 7:39 PM, Ángel González wrote:
>>
>>> Korvin wrote:
>>>
+1 for 7.0.x security patch release, best effort sounds scary.
>>> This is a salt. It doesn't need to be cryptog
On 19 October 2015 at 16:22, Tom Worster wrote:
> On 10/18/15 7:39 PM, Ángel González wrote:
>
>> Korvin wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for 7.0.x security patch release, best effort sounds scary.
>>>
>> This is a salt. It doesn't need to be cryptographically secure. Using
>> php_rand()
>> there should pose no
Hi!
I want to refresh Runkit's documentation. Please give me access rights to
do this. My php.net account is dzenovich.
Thanks!
On 10/18/15 7:39 PM, Ángel González wrote:
Korvin wrote:
+1 for 7.0.x security patch release, best effort sounds scary.
This is a salt. It doesn't need to be cryptographically secure. Using
php_rand()
there should pose no problem.
I would actually include that into the patch (move old lines 154
Okay, I've tried both wind...@lists.php.net and
php.wind...@lists.php.net and I give up trying there.
--
Since CAPICOM is deprecated, for users without ext/mcrypt or
ext/openssl, I'd like random_compat to work on Windows 7 and later.
$rng = new DOTNET(
'mscorlib',
'System
Hi Andrea,
I'm very much in favor of this RFC.
It's not just useful, I think void return declarations are needed in
order to establish sensible style rules for strict mode in real
projects. To be strict in our programming practices, the absence of a
return declaration signifies too many thing
> Am 19.10.2015 um 11:46 schrieb Derick Rethans :
>
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015, Rowan Collins wrote:
>
>> Korvin Szanto wrote on 14/10/2015 23:55:
>>> If I capture the result of a "void" method and check if my result variable
>>> with isset(), I'll get false. This sounds like it's void of value to me
Results for project PHP master, build date 2015-10-19 10:08:24+03:00
commit: 620daef1e253dc841f5dcb24976e5378c296e8cd
revision date: 2015-10-18 17:20:17-07:00
environment:Haswell-EP
cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores, stepping
2, LLC 45 MB
mem
2015-10-19 12:19 GMT+03:00 Nikita Popov :
> This change is primarily targeting userland methods, so your use-case is
> exactly the one this is supposed to prevent. Note that you can still use
> ->bindTo($object). The only thing you cannot do is ->bindTo($object,
> get_class($object)).
It's very
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015, Rowan Collins wrote:
> Korvin Szanto wrote on 14/10/2015 23:55:
> > If I capture the result of a "void" method and check if my result variable
> > with isset(), I'll get false. This sounds like it's void of value to me.
>
> But why "invent" (as far as PHP is concerned) this n
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Alexander Lisachenko <
lisachenko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, internals!
>
> Just noticed this thread and want to clarify some things with getClosure()
> method. If i understood correctly, ReflectionFunctionAbstract::getClosure()
> should return non-rebindable c
Hi Alexander,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Lisachenko [mailto:lisachenko...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 10:19 AM
> To: Anatol Belski
> Cc: Xinchen Hui ; Nikita Popov ;
> Dmitry Stogov ; PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Forbid rebinding scope of closure
Hello, internals!
Just noticed this thread and want to clarify some things with getClosure()
method. If i understood correctly, ReflectionFunctionAbstract::getClosure()
should return non-rebindable closure ONLY for internal functions, but for
userland functions binding should be still possible, ri
15 matches
Mail list logo
