hi,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> There are very few special processes. In fact the only RM-specific
> things are around packaging the tarballs up, while that's described in
> an README. Besides that all processes affect everybody in the community
> and everybody sh
hi
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 07:49 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
> I wonder if we really need two RMs. This two-RM-thing was introduced
> back when I was busy with different things at work, university,
> live, ... when Lukas stepped in t
On 2012-09-17, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Am 17.09.2012 17:36, schrieb Johannes Schl?ter:
>> There are very few special processes. In fact the only RM-specific
>> things are around packaging the tarballs up, while that's described in
>> an README.
>
> Does this have to be manual process? Is ther
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 17:45 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Am 17.09.2012 17:36, schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
> > There are very few special processes. In fact the only RM-specific
> > things are around packaging the tarballs up, while that's described in
> > an README.
>
> Does this have to be
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2012, at 8:30 AM, jpauli wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Hannes Magnusson
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:59 AM, jpauli wrote:
>
> I'm confused.. --enable-all is already supported, just like --disabl
Hi, all -
There's a bug in the current version of 5.3 and 5.4 with pdo_pgsql and
boolean PDO types. Here's a summary of the issue:
The following cases cause pgsql boolean types to be converted to an
incompatible (long) format:
1. PQprepare is not available (HAVE_PQPREPARE is undefined). This ha
On Sep 17, 2012, at 8:30 AM, jpauli wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Hannes Magnusson
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:59 AM, jpauli wrote:
I'm confused.. --enable-all is already supported, just like --disable-all ?
-Hannes
>>>
>>> AFAIR no :) We have a --di
On 09/17/2012 08:47 AM, Will Fitch wrote:
> I haven't seen a maintenance notification, and it appears git.php.net may
> be down. Anyone else able to reproduce this?
It is down at the moment yes. Slight mixup trying to add some firewall
rules.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
I haven't seen a maintenance notification, and it appears git.php.net may
be down. Anyone else able to reproduce this?
Am 17.09.2012 17:36, schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
> There are very few special processes. In fact the only RM-specific
> things are around packaging the tarballs up, while that's described in
> an README.
Does this have to be manual process? Is there something in it that
cannot be described in a M
Hi,
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 17:05 +0200, jpauli wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Herman Radtke wrote:
> >> David, I think you're experienced enough to fill this role alone.
> >
> >
> > One benefit to having two RM's is that Julien is learning from DSP. If
> > there is a strong reason to ha
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:59 AM, jpauli wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm confused.. --enable-all is already supported, just like --disable-all ?
>>>
>>> -Hannes
>>
>> AFAIR no :) We have a --disable-all , but no --enable-all.
>>
>> I'm +1 to add such a
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Herman Radtke wrote:
>> David, I think you're experienced enough to fill this role alone.
>
>
> One benefit to having two RM's is that Julien is learning from DSP. If
> there is a strong reason to have only one RM, then maybe we should consider
> a RM/vice-RM kind
> David, I think you're experienced enough to fill this role alone.
One benefit to having two RM's is that Julien is learning from DSP. If
there is a strong reason to have only one RM, then maybe we should consider
a RM/vice-RM kind of pairing.
--
Herman Radtke
hermanrad...@gmail.com | http://h
Hi,
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 07:49 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
> Let's keep things simple here, stay on topic and debate if we want to
> start with 5.5 and who can RM it.
I wonder if we really need two RMs. This two-RM-thing was introduced
back when I was busy with different things at work, univ
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:59 AM, jpauli wrote:
>>
>> I'm confused.. --enable-all is already supported, just like --disable-all ?
>>
>> -Hannes
>
> AFAIR no :) We have a --disable-all , but no --enable-all.
>
> I'm +1 to add such an option if possible :)
Can you please explain to me how it is not
hi Ferenc,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> Somehow, I've expected a bigger discussion about the election of the RMs.
Right, but if only one team volunteers, there is no need of voting,
except if there were objections to one of the members, but there is
none :)
> On a s
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, David Soria Parra wrote:
>
>> On 2012-09-08, David Soria Parra wrote:
>> > Hi internals,
>> > I would like to go ahead and propose Julien Pauli as the RM for 5.5. He
>> > is an active member of the PHP.net
2012/9/17 jpauli
> >
> > I'm confused.. --enable-all is already supported, just like
> --disable-all ?
> >
> > -Hannes
>
> AFAIR no :) We have a --disable-all , but no --enable-all.
>
> I'm +1 to add such an option if possible :)
>
> Julien.P
>
I don't like the idea, because once --enable-all is
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, David Soria Parra wrote:
> On 2012-09-08, David Soria Parra wrote:
> > Hi internals,
> > I would like to go ahead and propose Julien Pauli as the RM for 5.5. He
> > is an active member of the PHP.net community, has deep knowledge of
> > the internals and the nec
>
> I'm confused.. --enable-all is already supported, just like --disable-all ?
>
> -Hannes
AFAIR no :) We have a --disable-all , but no --enable-all.
I'm +1 to add such an option if possible :)
Julien.P
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.
Roger captain :)
I'll soon be on IRC to check this out and get used to PHP build tools
and environment :)
Julien.P
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, David Soria Parra wrote:
>> On 2012-09-08, David Soria Parra wrote:
>>> Hi internals,
>>>
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, David Soria Parra wrote:
> On 2012-09-08, David Soria Parra wrote:
>> Hi internals,
>> I would like to go ahead and propose Julien Pauli as the RM for 5.5. He
>> is an active member of the PHP.net community, has deep knowledge of
>> the internals and the necessar
On 2012-09-08, David Soria Parra wrote:
> Hi internals,
> I would like to go ahead and propose Julien Pauli as the RM for 5.5. He
> is an active member of the PHP.net community, has deep knowledge of
> the internals and the necessary backing from his company to be able to
> dedicate the time neede
24 matches
Mail list logo
