Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
A benefit of being addressed in the email that hasn't been mentioned yet,
johannes mentioned it:
http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg53737.html
Yes, I noticed it /after/ sending. :(
Our emails were alike. We mentioned the same usage pattern and both
chan
Hi!
That's a gmail (mis)feature.
If you receive an email twice, it is collapsed into one.
I actually don't get emails twice when replied to personally and on the
list too... Not gmail, exchange+Thunderbird, no idea who of them does it
but I'm OK with it.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Arch
2011/9/28 Ángel González :
> Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>>
>>> well if there would be used "Reply-To"-Headers
>>> tell me ONE reason to get every answer twice
>>
>> I don't get two emails in gmail, I don't know that the list is smart
>> enough to not send emails those who are to or cc'ed, or maybe it's
Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
well if there would be used "Reply-To"-Headers
tell me ONE reason to get every answer twice
I don't get two emails in gmail, I don't know that the list is smart
enough to not send emails those who are to or cc'ed, or maybe it's a
gmail feature.
That's a gmail (mis)feature.
Hi Reindl!
Do you realize that you are currently spamming hundreds of people that
have subscribed this mailing list with pointless meta-discussions
about how you think mailing list should work? The previous answer have
already explained in detail why *all* mailing lists (this is not
something spec
Am 28.09.2011 17:03, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
>> please configure the mailing-list correct
>> please add a hint that modern clients have a "reply-to-list"
>
> for the record, I don't have that in gmail.
>
>> please add a hint that the sender should be removed after
>> reply-all because "internals
Reindl, please read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
The list is configured correctly.
On 09/28/2011 07:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 28.09.2011 16:19, schrieb Hannes Magnusson:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 00:39, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>> PLEASE REPLY ONLY TO THE LIST
>>
>>
> please configure the mailing-list correct
> please add a hint that modern clients have a "reply-to-list"
for the record, I don't have that in gmail.
> please add a hint that the sender should be removed after
> reply-all because "internals@lists.php.net" is reaching the
> list AND the sender of
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 16:42 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 28.09.2011 16:19, schrieb Hannes Magnusson:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 00:39, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> PLEASE REPLY ONLY TO THE LIST
> >
> > PLEASE READ THE POSTING GUIDELINES BEFORE SCREAMING:
> > http://se.php.net/mailing-lists.php
Am 28.09.2011 16:19, schrieb Hannes Magnusson:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 00:39, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> PLEASE REPLY ONLY TO THE LIST
>
> PLEASE READ THE POSTING GUIDELINES BEFORE SCREAMING:
> http://se.php.net/mailing-lists.php
please configure the mailing-list correct
please add a hint that m
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 00:39, Reindl Harald wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY ONLY TO THE LIST
PLEASE READ THE POSTING GUIDELINES BEFORE SCREAMING:
http://se.php.net/mailing-lists.php
"Be sure to click Reply-All to reply to list. Clicking Reply will
email the author of the message privately."
-Hannes
--
Am 28.09.2011 10:53, schrieb Pierre Joye:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> without any param /tmp is right but not as magical fallback and in
> my opinion a well desigend webapp should never touch global /tmp
> shared with other hosts and applications
Well, a well conf
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> but it is wrong to create a file outside the open_basedir especially
> if a full qualified directory was passed where it should be created
Forgot to mention that this behavior is clearly documented:
http://www.php.net/tempnam
So it is no
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> without any param /tmp is right but not as magical fallback and in
> my opinion a well desigend webapp should never touch global /tmp
> shared with other hosts and applications
Well, a well configured shared host has correct temporary dire
Am 28.09.2011 10:46, schrieb Pierre Joye:
> hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> First, all you need to test is:
>
> $tempfile = tempnam($temp_folder, 'rhcsv');
> $fp = fopen($tempfile , 'w');
>
>> * /tmp MUST NOT be in open_basedir
>> * the temp-folder must be r
hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
First, all you need to test is:
$tempfile = tempnam($temp_folder, 'rhcsv');
$fp = fopen($tempfile , 'w');
> * /tmp MUST NOT be in open_basedir
> * the temp-folder must be read only
> * QUESTION1: why is tempnam() falling back to a dir o
Am 28.09.2011 09:28, schrieb Pierre Joye:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> $tmp_name = str_replace("\\", '/', tempnam($temp_folder, 'rhcsv'));
>
> Side note: this is never necessary, php does it for you. Unless you
> store paths yourself before calling a php file f
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> $tmp_name = str_replace("\\", '/', tempnam($temp_folder, 'rhcsv'));
Side note: this is never necessary, php does it for you. Unless you
store paths yourself before calling a php file function.
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepim
Am 28.09.2011 08:01, schrieb Antony Dovgal:
> On 09/28/2011 02:39 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> PLEASE REPLY ONLY TO THE LIST
>
> Please provide a short (10 lines max) but complete reproduce script.
> At the moment your explanations do not make any sense.
what do you think was the content of my la
19 matches
Mail list logo
