Hi Reindl! Do you realize that you are currently spamming hundreds of people that have subscribed this mailing list with pointless meta-discussions about how you think mailing list should work? The previous answer have already explained in detail why *all* mailing lists (this is not something specific to php-internals) ask you to reply to both author and the list.
I would kindly ask you to stop annoying me and others with further off topic messages and hope that the mailing list management will discard your messages if you continue to do so. Thanks. On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 28.09.2011 17:03, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs: >>> please configure the mailing-list correct >>> please add a hint that modern clients have a "reply-to-list" >> >> for the record, I don't have that in gmail. >> >>> please add a hint that the sender should be removed after >>> reply-all because "internals@lists.php.net" is reaching the >>> list AND the sender of the post where you write your answer >> >> and what if the sender is not subscribed to the list? > > then he can usually not send to a list > >> I don't get two emails in gmail, I don't know that the list is smart >> enough to not send emails those who are to or cc'ed, or maybe it's a >> gmail feature. > > you get them not if the person who answered was smart enough > to use "reply to list" or deleted the second address > >>> using "reply-to-list" will only answer to the mailinglist >>> this is why the following headers exists >>> >>> list-help: <mailto:internals-h...@lists.php.net> >>> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:internals-unsubscr...@lists.php.net> >>> list-post: <mailto:internals@lists.php.net> >>> List-Id: internals.lists.php.net >> >> thats not the main reason why those headers exists AFAIK, but I agree >> that it could be used for reply-to-list >> >> as I mentioned before, nobody knows every participant in the list, so >> if you reply someone, it is better to not only send it to the list.but >> to that person also, because you don't know that he is on the list or >> not. > > normally you have to subscribe for sending to a list and i would wonder > if every spambot can anonymously post to php-devel, so if somebody sends > to the list he also receives it > > Am 28.09.2011 17:05, schrieb Rasmus Lerdorf: >> Reindl, please read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html >> The list is configured correctly > > well and there i read the text below > > and that was the reason why i said last night PLEASE reply only to the > list because i need not every message twice and answering to the > wrong duplicate leaves the list out, one of you both mails has "reply to list" > and the other copy not, if i use the other copy you get a lonely answer > leaving the list out of rcpt > >>>> But it already is easy. Reasonable mail programs have two separate "reply" >>>> commands: >>>> one that replies directly to the author of a message, and another that >>>> replies to the >>>> author plus all of the list recipients. Even the lowly Berkeley Mail >>>> command has had >>>> this for about a decade. > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
