David Muir wrote:
FWIW, PEAR is already moving to GitHub.
So who dictated that
There should at least be a little consistency in PHP and this is just another
example of everybody just doing what they want and sod the rest of us :(
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Cont
Thanks !
"Xinchen Hui" wrote in message
news:7256329410255948429@unknownmsgid...
hi
every api has lots of 'samples' ,that are the standard extensions in
src/ext/*
:)
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
在 2011-8-26，11:20，Aaron Gray 写道：
Hi Stas,
"Stas Malyshev" wrote in message
news:4e56f0d
hi
every api has lots of 'samples' ,that are the standard extensions in src/ext/*
:)
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
在 2011-8-26，11:20，Aaron Gray 写道：
> Hi Stas,
>
> "Stas Malyshev" wrote in message
> news:4e56f0d6.20...@sugarcrm.com...
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 8/25/11 5:52 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
>>> T
Hi Stas,
"Stas Malyshev" wrote in message
news:4e56f0d6.20...@sugarcrm.com...
Hi!
On 8/25/11 5:52 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
Thinking about it what I really want to do is see if a key exists in an
array and get its type to see if it is BOOL and that it is TRUE.
For this, you will need to call z
I've committed the fixes for my two of my packages to support this change..
Who ever thinks this is such a great idea, could you kindly file bugs
against all the packages below to request they fix their 'bugs' or
verify the input
http://pear.php.net/bugs/
Since the behaviour of is_a(
Hi!
On 8/25/11 5:52 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
Thinking about it what I really want to do is see if a key exists in an
array and get its type to see if it is BOOL and that it is TRUE.
For this, you will need to call zend_hash_find (or zend_symtable_find if
there's a possibility of keys like "0" th
"Christopher Jones" wrote in message
news:4e56e662.90...@oracle.com...
On 08/25/2011 05:16 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
"Chris Stockton" wrote in message
news:calkfbxvsuq-zqyytdxi3a9tccieh6xzz9y-kbyqva8kpc4-...@mail.gmail.com...
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Aaron Gray
wrote:
Hi,
I
""Aaron Gray"" wrote in message
news:a1.a0.22704.0d5e6...@pb1.pair.com...
"Chris Stockton" wrote in message
news:calkfbxvsuq-zqyytdxi3a9tccieh6xzz9y-kbyqva8kpc4-...@mail.gmail.com...
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a C extension module for PHP
On 08/25/2011 05:16 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
"Chris Stockton" wrote in message
news:calkfbxvsuq-zqyytdxi3a9tccieh6xzz9y-kbyqva8kpc4-...@mail.gmail.com...
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a C extension module for PHP and am wondering about an API
"Chris Stockton" wrote in message
news:calkfbxvsuq-zqyytdxi3a9tccieh6xzz9y-kbyqva8kpc4-...@mail.gmail.com...
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a C extension module for PHP and am wondering about an
API
issue.
I can see how to add to an associati
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a C extension module for PHP and am wondering about an API
> issue.
>
> I can see how to add to an associative array :-
>
Most everything you need to know about manipulating arrays can be
found in ext/standard/ar
On 08/26/2011 04:12 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> 2011/8/24 David Soria Parra :
>> Hi Internals,,
>>
>> after 3 weeks of discussion, I think we are ready to start voting on
>> the DVCS RFC. If you think something is missing or should be explained
>> in more detail, let me know.
> I won't trans
Hi,
I am working on a C extension module for PHP and am wondering about an API
issue.
I can see how to add to an associative array :-
zval *aa;
MAKE_STD_ZVAL(aa);
array_init(aa);
Hi,
I am working on a C extension module for PHP and am wondering about an API
issue.
I can see how to add to an
Hi,
I am working on a C extension module for PHP and am wondering about an API
issue.
I can see how to add to an associative array :-
zval *aa;
MAKE_STD_ZVAL(aa);
array_init(aa);
add_assoc_string(aa, "test", "test value", 1);
but how do I transverse an associative array of value
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:26 PM, marius adrian popa wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>> On 08/23/2011 09:45 AM, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>>> Hi:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 03:08:09PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
FAIL DateTime::diff() days -- spring type2 ty
If we do decide to make a VCS change the vote should be fairly one
sided for "option of choice" as this has a fairly broad impact on our
development process.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:03 PM, David Soria Parra wrote:
> Hi Internals,,
>
> after 3 weeks of discussion, I think we are ready to start v
2011/8/24 David Soria Parra :
> Hi Internals,,
>
> after 3 weeks of discussion, I think we are ready to start voting on
> the DVCS RFC. If you think something is missing or should be explained
> in more detail, let me know.
I won't transfer the discussion over here but; I don't want to move to
a
2011/8/25 Patrick ALLAERT :
> 2011/8/25 Gustavo Lopes :
>> You could fetch the parent and do the same check, and so on.
>
> Checking only the topmost should be enough if traversing the whole
> inheritance could be avoided.
Well, of course I highly second the opinion that not making
distinction and
2011/8/25 Gustavo Lopes :
> You could fetch the parent and do the same check, and so on.
Checking only the topmost should be enough if traversing the whole
inheritance could be avoided.
> I think you
> might be able to just check whether ce.create_object is not NULL, because if
> the internal cla
I'm not familiar enough with Mercurial to properly vote, but am
guessing we'll move to Git. Git is popular because Github is
popular, and Github is popular because it's awesome.
But I think we should skip git.php.net and mirrors/bridges, and
simply move to Github. And this means people who mai
Sebastian,
This is a hidden gem for us! =D
Thanks a lot for putting your effort into this.
Cheers,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> Thanks for working on this Sebastian, its really appreciated! +1 from me!
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote
Thanks for working on this Sebastian, its really appreciated! +1 from me!
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 02:54 PM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
>
>> You could fetch the parent and do the same check, and so on. I think you
>> might be able to just check whether
On 2011-08-25, "a...@akbkhome.com" wrote:
> I'm not sure it's possible to get agreement on if this is a bug or
> not, you might see a bug, I just see this as a pointless change for
> consistency that pretty much nobody will ever need or use.
Please don't generalize based on your own opinions and
On 08/25/2011 02:54 PM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
You could fetch the parent and do the same check, and so on. I think you
might be able to just check whether ce.create_object is not NULL, because
if the internal class doesn't replace create_object, there's no chance of
that class of crashes occurring
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:41:27 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann
wrote:
On 08/25/2011 01:46 PM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
What about userland classes that extend internal classes?
Good point. How would I implement such a check?
You could fetch the parent and do the same check, and so on. I think you
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 14:54, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 14:49, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>> On 08/25/2011 02:47 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
>>>
>>> Speaking of which, wouldn't it be easier to check all our internal
>>> classes for such failures and fix them acco
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 14:49, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 02:47 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
>>
>> Speaking of which, wouldn't it be easier to check all our internal
>> classes for such failures and fix them accordingly with this addition
>> (Fix the dont-crash-without-calli
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 01:46 PM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
>>
>> What about userland classes that extend internal classes?
>
> Good point. How would I implement such a check?
Checking the same thing than what instanceof does
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@p
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 14:43, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 02:39 PM, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
>>
>> To me this feature makes no sense. But if people find use for it and
>> it remains in Reflection, I won't object to it, so +0.
>
> It should only be used for meta programming, of co
On 08/25/2011 02:47 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
Speaking of which, wouldn't it be easier to check all our internal
classes for such failures and fix them accordingly with this addition
(Fix the dont-crash-without-calling-constructor)?
We could do like that of above and cast an exception inst
Hi
2011/8/25 Sebastian Bergmann :
> Good point. How would I implement such a check?
Speaking of which, wouldn't it be easier to check all our internal
classes for such failures and fix them accordingly with this addition
(Fix the dont-crash-without-calling-constructor)?
We could do like that of
On 08/25/2011 02:39 PM, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
To me this feature makes no sense. But if people find use for it and
it remains in Reflection, I won't object to it, so +0.
It should only be used for meta programming, of course ;-)
If an internal class can't behave well without a constructor ca
On 08/25/2011 01:46 PM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
What about userland classes that extend internal classes?
Good point. How would I implement such a check?
--
Sebastian BergmannCo-Founder and Principal Consultant
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://th
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:46, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> I have attached a patch to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55490 that
> implements ReflectionClass::newInstanceWithoutConstructor() to create an
> object a class without invoking the constructor.
To me this feature makes no sense.
On 08/25/2011 02:26 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:
Wouldn't ReflectionClass::newMockInstance() be a better name?
It is not specific to stubbing/mocking.
What other use cases exists?
ORM and stubbing/mocking should be enough.
--
Sebastian BergmannCo-Founder and Principal
On 25 August 2011 10:46, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> I have attached a patch to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55490 that
> implements ReflectionClass::newInstanceWithoutConstructor() to create an
> object a class without invoking the constructor.
>
> As there are certain internal classes tha
2011/8/25 Sebastian Bergmann :
> I have attached a patch to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55490 that
> implements ReflectionClass::newInstanceWithoutConstructor() to create an
> object a class without invoking the constructor.
>
> As there are certain internal classes that would "crash" when
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:46:21 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann
wrote:
I have attached a patch to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55490 that
implements ReflectionClass::newInstanceWithoutConstructor() to create
an
object a class without invoking the constructor.
As there are certain intern
hi,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> I have attached a patch to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55490 that
> implements ReflectionClass::newInstanceWithoutConstructor() to create an
> object a class without invoking the constructor.
>
> As there are certain intern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/25/2011 11:56 AM, Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa wrote:
> On 25/08/11 11:37, David Soria Parra wrote:
>>
>> On 08/25/2011 11:28 AM, Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa wrote:
>>> On 25/08/11 11:15, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote: I agre
On 25/08/11 11:37, David Soria Parra wrote:
On 08/25/2011 11:28 AM, Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa wrote:
On 25/08/11 11:15, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote: I agree, and I also think
that before people can make a choice they need to have played with
all the options. Just p
I have attached a patch to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55490 that
implements ReflectionClass::newInstanceWithoutConstructor() to create an
object a class without invoking the constructor.
As there are certain internal classes that would "crash" when their
constructor is not invoked, this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/25/2011 11:28 AM, Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa wrote:
> On 25/08/11 11:15, Derick Rethans wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote: I agree, and I also think
>> that before people can make a choice they need to have played with
>> all the option
On 25/08/11 11:15, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote:
On 8/24/11 2:03 PM, David Soria Parra wrote:
after 3 weeks of discussion, I think we are ready to start voting on
the DVCS RFC. If you think something is missing or should be
explained in more detail, let me kn
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> On 8/24/11 2:03 PM, David Soria Parra wrote:
> >
> > after 3 weeks of discussion, I think we are ready to start voting on
> > the DVCS RFC. If you think something is missing or should be
> > explained in more detail, let me know.
>
> I'm not sure ch
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 08:39 +, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> - Given that we've already done it - I wouldn't revert it. Fix it in
> PEAR. That's the only way to create something that works across all
> versions of 5.3.x.
Unfortunately this is the case.
johannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Dev
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:31 AM
>> To: a...@akbkhome.com
>> Cc: Stas Malyshev; internals@lists.php.net
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.8 Released!
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:31 AM
> To: a...@akbkhome.com
> Cc: Stas Malyshev; internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.8 Released!
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:51 AM, a...@akbkhome.com
> wrot
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:51 AM, a...@akbkhome.com wrote:
> BTW. we could really do with a searchable archive of php.dev + internals...
> - It's pretty difficult to find out if this was ever discussed before..
Again, it was discussed already and the argument of using instanceof
was used to depre
There is something that confuses me. Let there be a class member
Foo::$bar, which has to be initialized as an empty array in the
constructor. If I do that (via zend_update_property), its refcount is
increased (from 1, which it gets after alloc + array_init, to 2). It is
obvious why this happens
50 matches
Mail list logo
