On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 14:54, Etienne Kneuss <col...@php.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 14:49, Sebastian Bergmann <sebast...@php.net> wrote: >> On 08/25/2011 02:47 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: >>> >>> Speaking of which, wouldn't it be easier to check all our internal >>> classes for such failures and fix them accordingly with this addition >>> (Fix the dont-crash-without-calling-constructor)? >>> >>> We could do like that of above and cast an exception instead of >>> E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR (as I believe is being cast now) in 5.4. >> >> Makes sense to me. > > There is already some standardized checks for 5.4 that wrap around the > get_constructor handler.
In SPL, that is > But it should/could be standardized at the > engine level. And those raise exceptions in case they detect a > uncalled constructor. > >> >> -- >> Sebastian Bergmann Co-Founder and Principal Consultant >> http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://thePHP.cc/ >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > > > > -- > Etienne Kneuss > http://www.colder.ch > -- Etienne Kneuss http://www.colder.ch -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
