Looking at JavaScript which acts quite similarly to the proposed
approach, the Number methods [1] are not many and not often useful,
but still they exist. What happens if you do "3.3"->ceil() ? If ceil()
exists only in \numeric, you could say autoconvert, but if it exists
in both \string and \nume
On Apr 2, 2011, at 15:24 , Jordi Boggiano wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jacob Oettinger wrote:
>> On Mar 31, 2011, at 21:10 , Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/31/2011 10:58 AM, Martin Scotta wrote:
I think it's time to stop thinking in terms of "functions" and move
forward
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Stan Vass wrote:
> This is actually something I have been toying with a bit. Adding the
>> ability to call methods on both strings and arrays. I still don't like
>> the idea of making them real objects as the overhead and the amount of
>> code that would need to b
This is actually something I have been toying with a bit. Adding the
ability to call methods on both strings and arrays. I still don't like
the idea of making them real objects as the overhead and the amount of
code that would need to be changed in the core and in every extension is
daunting. Anyb
On 2011.04.02. 13:38, Jacob Oettinger wrote:
On Mar 31, 2011, at 21:10 , Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On 03/31/2011 10:58 AM, Martin Scotta wrote:
I think it's time to stop thinking in terms of "functions" and move
forward to "abstractions"
$s1 = 'string';
$s1->contains($s2);
$s1->indexOf($s2) ===
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jacob Oettinger wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2011, at 21:10 , Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
>> On 03/31/2011 10:58 AM, Martin Scotta wrote:
>>> I think it's time to stop thinking in terms of "functions" and move
>>> forward to "abstractions"
>>>
>>> $s1 = 'string';
>>> $s1->contai
On Mar 31, 2011, at 21:10 , Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On 03/31/2011 10:58 AM, Martin Scotta wrote:
>> I think it's time to stop thinking in terms of "functions" and move
>> forward to "abstractions"
>>
>> $s1 = 'string';
>> $s1->contains($s2);
>>
>> $s1->indexOf($s2) === strpos($s1, $s2);
>>
>>
