On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 21:00, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 20:53, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:37:14 -, Michael Maclean
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I've seen quite a few reports that some people are seeing a CentOS test
>>> page when going to http://lxr.p
Hi!
Sorry for no attachments in previous message, I think my attachments
weren't redirected with message by lists.php.net email confirmation
system. I send them again, and for sure I attach links to public copy of
them over HTTP:
https://gist.github.com/761094 - php-5.3.4-hashtable-optimization.
On 31/12/10 20:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
What poor setup to display software-information on a non-configured hostname
even calling ip-address directly instead mod_security blocking such calls
The IP of the machine displaying the CentOS page is no longer mine, nor
does it have anything to do wit
Hi!
But still I have to ask if I'm the only one thinking about this or is
there something I'm being completely ignorant about?
You're not the only one thinking about it. But so far nobody moved from
thinking about it to actually doing it :)
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM
Hi!
IIRC many deprecation warnings, which totally broke the output.
Err, you actually output the warnings in your output? In production?!
Please tell me you turned it off now, at least - it would make
deprecation warning doubly beneficial. I'd even consider inserting
couple of random ones j
Hi!
About namespaced functions and constants, the fact that they are not
autoloaded makes them useless for any code that wants some good
packaging. For example I looked at the Doctrine2 code, and (tell me if
This is not true. You can always load stuff manually - in fact, many
languages don't
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 15:00, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
>
> ns6 is also returning bogus results for prototype.php.net..
> I bet it has something to do with my awesome syntax error in the file
> coupleof days ago - ans ns6 isn't smart enough to retrieve the update.
> Wise guys tell me bumping the se
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 15:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
> You have to wait unzil the TTL is over
> Jesus why is the TTL so hughe?
>
> lxr.php.net. 61221 IN A 94.23.222.92
>
> [ha...@srv-rhsoft:~]$ dig A lxr.php.net @NS2.EASYDNS.COM
> lxr.php.net. 86400 IN CNAME sp2.php.net.
> s
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 20:53, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:37:14 -, Michael Maclean
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I've seen quite a few reports that some people are seeing a CentOS test
>> page when going to http://lxr.php.net. I, however, don't. If anyone reading
>> this sees this,
You have to wait unzil the TTL is over
Jesus why is the TTL so hughe?
lxr.php.net. 61221 IN A 94.23.222.92
[ha...@srv-rhsoft:~]$ dig A lxr.php.net @NS2.EASYDNS.COM
lxr.php.net.86400 IN CNAME sp2.php.net.
sp2.php.net.86400 IN A 173.236.52.218
BTW:
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:37:14 -, Michael Maclean
wrote:
Hi,
I've seen quite a few reports that some people are seeing a CentOS test
page when going to http://lxr.php.net. I, however, don't. If anyone
reading this sees this, can you reply and let me know what your DNS
resolves lxr.php
Hi,
I've seen quite a few reports that some people are seeing a CentOS test
page when going to http://lxr.php.net. I, however, don't. If anyone
reading this sees this, can you reply and let me know what your DNS
resolves lxr.php.net as? Ideally, the output from dig or dnstracer would
be handy.
On Friday, December 31, 2010 7:56:39 am Nicolas Grekas wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> this RFC started by me having a problem on these subjects (not only me
> I think) :
> - namespaced functions and constants loading, or rather not-autoloading,
> - interfaces loading (this time, autoloading).
> So, my
As a 'grown up' you should never expect changes to a system to just work
without testing, any change introduces risk, you need to mitigate against that
risk by testing. Irrespective of whatever the php release notes say (you did
read them didn't you), one should run the new version against your
hi,
Thanks for the patches :)
Can you open a bug report please (and attach the patches to it)? I'm
sure this patch will be updated a couple of times before it reaches
the repository.
Cheers,
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Marcin Babij
wrote:
> Sorry for no attachments in previous message, I
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:40:44 -, Marcin Babij
wrote:
Why we do this?
We run profiling on our production servers and found out that zend_hash_*
functions take 10-20% CPU time of request. So there is some room for easy
improvements.
What was done?
- Hash function in zend_hash.h was rebuilt
On 12/31/10 3:49 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Stas Malyshev wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> Just had such a problem myself a few weeks ago: a minor update
>>> (IIRC was from 5.3.2 to 5.3.3) broke virtually all of my web applications
>>
>> Out of curiosity - what exactly broke it? What change was it?
>
> II
Sorry for no attachments in previous message, I think my attachments
weren't redirected with message by lists.php.net email confirmation
system. I send them again, and for sure I attach links to public copy of
them over HTTP:
https://gist.github.com/761094 - php-5.3.4-hashtable-optimization.
Sorry, I've attached .patch files, I'm attaching them as .txt now.
hi,
Did you forget to attach the patch? Attach it as .txt so the list
won't reject it.
Cheers,
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Marcin Babij
wrote:
Hello,
I work for social network company, where we were running optimization
hi,
Did you forget to attach the patch? Attach it as .txt so the list
won't reject it.
Cheers,
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Marcin Babij
wrote:
> Hello,
> I work for social network company, where we were running optimization
> project. One of it's results is patch to Zend engine's Hashtable
Hello,
I work for social network company, where we were running optimization
project. One of it's results is patch to Zend engine's Hashtable, which we
want to share and ask you for comments and improvements.
Why we do this?
We run profiling on our production servers and found out that zend_
On 31 December 2010 14:15, mark skilbeck wrote:
> I did it like
> so: https://bitbucket.org/winapiforphp/system/src/93583820bbc1/winsystem_registry.c#cl-298
> It's a little messy.
I got that. 4 times no less.
--
Richard Quadling
Twitter : EE : Zend
@RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O
I did it like so:
bitbucket.org/winapiforphp/system/src/93583820bbc1/winsystem_registry.c#cl-298
It's a little messy.
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> What macros exist regarding processing arrays in PHP (core not userland)?
>
> I want to pass ...
>
> array('v
On 31 December 2010 14:08, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> Hi Richard
>
> 2010/12/31 Richard Quadling :
>> Hi.
>>
>> What macros exist regarding processing arrays in PHP (core not userland)?
>
> Zend hash, see Zend/zend_hash.c for its API.
>
>> I want to pass ...
>>
>> array('value1', 'value2', 'val
Hi Richard
2010/12/31 Richard Quadling :
> Hi.
>
> What macros exist regarding processing arrays in PHP (core not userland)?
Zend hash, see Zend/zend_hash.c for its API.
> I want to pass ...
>
> array('value1', 'value2', 'value3')
You would do something like:
PHP_FUNCTION(test)
{
zval *
Dear all,
this RFC started by me having a problem on these subjects (not only me
I think) :
- namespaced functions and constants loading, or rather not-autoloading,
- interfaces loading (this time, autoloading).
About namespaced functions and constants, the fact that they are not
autoloaded makes
Hi.
What macros exist regarding processing arrays in PHP (core not userland)?
I want to pass ...
array('value1', 'value2', 'value3')
to a function and in the function have it converted to
'value1\0value2\0value3\0\0'.
Conventionally, I'd need to iterate the array to get the lengths of
all the
* Rune Kaagaard wrote:
> Dear internals
>
> After enviously looking at pythons grammar
> (http://docs.python.org/dev/reference/grammar.html) I keep feeling
> that PHP is missing out on a lot of interesting meta projects by not
> having an official EBNF.
ACK. PHP also misses a lot of other fundam
* Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> >Just had such a problem myself a few weeks ago: a minor update
> >(IIRC was from 5.3.2 to 5.3.3) broke virtually all of my web applications
>
> Out of curiosity - what exactly broke it? What change was it?
IIRC many deprecation warnings, which totally broke the
Dear internals
After enviously looking at pythons grammar
(http://docs.python.org/dev/reference/grammar.html) I keep feeling
that PHP is missing out on a lot of interesting meta projects by not
having an official EBNF.
Building your own PHP parser is _very_ hard and is PhD (Paul Biggar:)
level st
2010/12/31 Ferenc Kovacs :
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
[snip]
> Btw: maybe we could announce the RCs to a wider audience.
> I mean announce it on the site, tweet/blog about it, ask the community for
> testing and feedback.
> currently only thoose who closely follow the
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Just had such a problem myself a few weeks ago: a minor update
>> (IIRC was from 5.3.2 to 5.3.3) broke virtually all of my web applications
>>
>
> Out of curiosity - what exactly broke it? What change was it?
>
>
> I got the stran
32 matches
Mail list logo
