On Mar 27, 2010, at 3:59 PM, Bharat Nagwani wrote:
> I might have missed earlier emails. How about this?
>
> $myLongNameObject = new myLongNameObject {
>property1: '1',
>property2: '2',
>property3: '3',
>property4: '4',
>property5: '5',
> };
>
> Can we av
I might have missed earlier emails. How about this?
$myLongNameObject = new myLongNameObject {
property1: '1',
property2: '2',
property3: '3',
property4: '4',
property5: '5',
};
Can we avoid the new as well like in Javascript?
$myLongNameObject = {
pro
Hi,
There is another solution to this problem, which is sort-of-on-the-table,
and it's named parameters:
$myLongNameObject = new MyLongNameObject(
'property1' => '1',
'property2' => '2',
'property3' => '3',
'property4' => '4',
'property5' => '5',
);
With pr
On 03/27/2010 08:09 PM, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
You can always use a (temporary) alias to shorten things
$myLongNameObject = new MyLongNameObject();
$t = $myLongNameObject;
$t->property1 = '1';
$t->property2 = '2';
$t->property3 = '3';
$t->property4 = '4';
$t->property5 = '5
On 03/27/2010 07:23 PM, Martin Jansen wrote:
On 27.03.10 17:02, Toorion wrote:
$myLongNameObject = new MyLongNameObject();
$myLongNameObject->property1 = '1';
$myLongNameObject->property2 = '2';
$myLongNameObject->property3 = '3';
$myLongNameObject->property4 = '4';
$myLongNameOb
2010/3/27 Johannes Schlüter :
> Syntax-wise it /could/ work like this:
>
> with ($MyLongNameObject) {
> ->property1 = '';
> ->property2 = '';
> }
>
> but there's no big benefit over an alias but way more confusion with a
> new syntax, a new keyword, ...
This syntax is well known i
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 19:02 +0300, Toorion wrote:
> Very often (for example when work with dom or UI object) setting plenty
> of object properties is require. At this time we has not a lot options.
> Standard way looks very dirty and be reason of more copy-paste-work.
>
> Reproduce code:
> --
>> However, the proposal reminds me of Pascal's 'with'-construct:
>>
>> new(pointertob);
>>
>> with pointertob^ do
>> begin
>> a := 10;
>> b := 'A';
>> c := nil
>> end;
>
> Can one do something like "b := this.a"? This sounds like a huge can of
> worms to me.
Ehm, I don't see what might be p
On 27.03.10 17:29, Stefan Marr wrote:
>
> On 27 Mar 2010, at 17:23, Martin Jansen wrote:
>
>> On 27.03.10 17:02, Toorion wrote:
>>> $myLongNameObject = new MyLongNameObject();
>>> $myLongNameObject->property1 = '1';
>>> $myLongNameObject->property2 = '2';
>>> $myLongNameObject->property3
On 27 Mar 2010, at 17:23, Martin Jansen wrote:
> On 27.03.10 17:02, Toorion wrote:
>> $myLongNameObject = new MyLongNameObject();
>> $myLongNameObject->property1 = '1';
>> $myLongNameObject->property2 = '2';
>> $myLongNameObject->property3 = '3';
>> $myLongNameObject->property4 = '444
On 27.03.10 17:02, Toorion wrote:
> $myLongNameObject = new MyLongNameObject();
> $myLongNameObject->property1 = '1';
> $myLongNameObject->property2 = '2';
> $myLongNameObject->property3 = '3';
> $myLongNameObject->property4 = '4';
> $myLongNameObject->property5 = '5';
[...]
>
Very often (for example when work with dom or UI object) setting plenty
of object properties is require. At this time we has not a lot options.
Standard way looks very dirty and be reason of more copy-paste-work.
Reproduce code:
---
$myLongNameObject = new MyLongNameObject();
$myLong
On 27.03.2010 13:13, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> I like the way how the debian guys elect the project leader:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian#Project_organization
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Debian-organigram.png
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_method
Hi,
while I do agree that they
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>
> On 25.03.2010, at 22:58, Christopher Jones wrote:
>
> > After considering what is needed by PHP, I believe the vote should
> > primarily be thought of as a choice between Derick and David. If
> > either wants to bring in a co-RM to sh
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
>
> On 27.03.2010, at 9:05, Thomas Hruska wrote:
>
> > One thought: Has a way to track call depth been considered (perhaps
> _execute())? If the number of calls exceeds a certain (reasonable) number,
> a warning or notice could be displa
On 25.03.2010, at 22:58, Christopher Jones wrote:
> After considering what is needed by PHP, I believe the vote should
> primarily be thought of as a choice between Derick and David. If
> either wants to bring in a co-RM to share the load, then I suggest
> Lukas be first choice.
>
> I'd be happ
On 27.03.2010, at 9:05, Thomas Hruska wrote:
> One thought: Has a way to track call depth been considered (perhaps
> _execute())? If the number of calls exceeds a certain (reasonable) number, a
> warning or notice could be displayed and the output buffer flushed. That
> way, when it crashes
17 matches
Mail list logo
