Hi!
some time back (August 08) I complained about 'use' being at a weird
position and not at the same place as 'global' or 'static' where I
expected it. Back then Dmitry asked me to provide a patch to check out
the alternative. Now during the holidays I finally found some time to
change from:
On Sunday 04 January 2009 8:17:27 pm Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Larry,
> >
> > $f = function() use ($y, &$z) {
> > global $x; // By reference
> > }
> >
> > $y is clearly by value, and $z clearly by reference, as that parallels
> > the way function parameters work right next to the lexical va
Hello Larry,
Sunday, January 4, 2009, 10:05:25 PM, you wrote:
> On Sunday 04 January 2009 10:45:30 am Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>> Marcus Boerger schrieb:
>> > $f = function() { use $x; }
>>
>> +1 for consistency.
> +1 for consistency as well, which is why, as I recall, that syntax was
> rejec
On Sunday 04 January 2009 10:45:30 am Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Marcus Boerger schrieb:
> > $f = function() { use $x; }
>
> +1 for consistency.
+1 for consistency as well, which is why, as I recall, that syntax was
rejected.
$f = function() {
global $x; // By reference.
use $y; // By va
Marcus Boerger schrieb:
> $f = function() { use $x; }
+1 for consistency.
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscr
Hi,
This behavior seems strange, but the rationale of this function is that
the (east asian) width of the resulting string does not exceed the
specified value so that it would fit to a fixed sized box when rendered
in the browser, assuming the string would be displayed with a monospace
font.
Hello Internals, Dmitry, Lukas, Johannes,
some time back (August 08) I complained about 'use' being at a weird
position and not at the same place as 'global' or 'static' where I
expected it. Back then Dmitry asked me to provide a patch to check out
the alternative. Now during the holidys I final
Hi Johannes,
foo = "foo";$o->foo(); //Example 1
$o->bar = function(){}; $o->bar(); //Example 2
?>
The example 1 must not work, because PHP tries to call $o->foo() as a
function, but not $o->foo as description for the function.
To make example 2 working, the declaration has to be cha
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 15:47 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> > I'd say it would be good to concentrate on making 5.3 stable and then
> > see how new features are accepted. If users really demand such a
> > functionality, when using closures for "real life" development, we can
> > still add it, b
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 14:12 +0100, Marcin Kurzyna wrote:
> as you said it's saving the zend_function member that is tricky. i
> thought i'd go with saving function string and recompiling it as you
> suggested (i don't want to mess with APC although i find the idea of
> opcode serialization much
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Timm Friebe wrote:
> Hi,
> is there any reason php://input is not supported in CLI sapi? It would be
> nice to test raw post data reading in unittests without having to run them
> inside a web server sapi and it's only a five-line patch making php://input
> read fro
11 matches
Mail list logo
