Best regards,
Marcus
Best regards,
Marcus--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Best regards,
Marcusproperties-6.0-20090101-d.diff.txt>--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: ht
Antony Dovgal schrieb:
On 01.01.2009 18:03, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
Hi,
after syncing with PHP 5.3 head I have a problem with compiling under Linux.
After the first failure I went through a 'make distclean; ./configure;
make' - cycle,
but got the same failure:
./cvsclean && ./bu
hi!
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Lukas,
>
> if anything requires an internal API change than we at least should do
> those parts. Besides this issue was long ago raised and imo should go in.
> As we get more and more people testing what 5.3 will be we get more an
Hello David,
I added test closure_037.phpt to demonstrate this.
marcus
Thursday, January 1, 2009, 5:23:08 PM, you wrote:
> Hi folks,
> first of all, thank you Marcus for implementing this. Very cool.
> As for the __get()/__getClosure() stuff, I don't think it's necessary
> or even an issu
Hi folks,
first of all, thank you Marcus for implementing this. Very cool.
As for the __get()/__getClosure() stuff, I don't think it's necessary
or even an issue. One can never simply do $this-
>getOverloadPropertyWithInvoke() anyway, because if the prop is not
there, a fatal error would be
Hello Hannes,
as discussed online. At the moment we should not have any __get()
calls during method resolution. The newly updated patch does that
now. And I think we are now safe to submit.
In the future we could think of adding __getClosure() which would be
called to resolve a dynamic closure.
On 01.01.2009 18:03, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after syncing with PHP 5.3 head I have a problem with compiling under Linux.
> After the first failure I went through a 'make distclean; ./configure;
> make' - cycle,
> but got the same failure:
./cvsclean && ./buildconf
--
Wbr,
Anton
Hello Hannes,
Wednesday, December 31, 2008, 8:33:43 PM, you wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 20:12, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>> Hello Lars,
>>
>> Wednesday, December 31, 2008, 6:59:08 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Markus,
>>
>>> have you measured the performance impact in a class with - say - ten
>>> me
Hi,
after syncing with PHP 5.3 head I have a problem with compiling under Linux.
After the first failure I went through a 'make distclean; ./configure;
make' - cycle,
but got the same failure:
bernh...@heist:~/devel/PHP/php5$ cvs status main/spprintf.c
=
Hello Lukas,
if anything requires an internal API change than we at least should do
those parts. Besides this issue was long ago raised and imo should go in.
As we get more and more people testing what 5.3 will be we get more and
more complains about the lack of these. And isn't that the goal of
Hi Lukas,
Am Donnerstag, den 01.01.2009, 02:36 +0200 schrieb George Antoniadis:
[...]
> Any news on this? :)
> I don't see this in 5.3 but are there any hopes for pushing this on
> the HEAD of 6 sometime soon? :)
Not from my side. But I think I will find time to work on it in the next
few weeks.
11 matches
Mail list logo
