Hello Lukas, if anything requires an internal API change than we at least should do those parts. Besides this issue was long ago raised and imo should go in. As we get more and more people testing what 5.3 will be we get more and more complains about the lack of these. And isn't that the goal of an alpha verison as well?
marcus Thursday, January 1, 2009, 3:53:02 AM, you wrote: > On 01.01.2009, at 01:36, George Antoniadis wrote: >>> I guess very-very soon is already over, and yes, absolutely, this >>> patch is >>> far from perfection, so I'd also delay it. Maybe someone (Lars from >>> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/static-classes?) might also want to gather >>> some >>> motivation for the __*Static() methods as in good use cases... >>> >>> - Timm >>> >> >> Any news on this? :) >> I don't see this in 5.3 but are there any hopes for pushing this on >> the HEAD >> of 6 sometime soon? :) > Stas reviewed the patch and determined that it needs a bit more work. > Its too late for 5.3 I would say now, but the main stumbling point is > the lack of a proper patch. Its still noted on the "future PHP > releases" 5.3 todo wiki page. > regards, > Lukas Best regards, Marcus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
