bogotify veeblefester twoway overestimated mathematically disagree powerhungry
hooked letterbomb
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Ryan Panning wrote:
I've been wondering, is such a thing even possible? Is there a good way
to implement an object destruct order? Here are my thoughts:
In the class definition, specify what "level" of destruction the objects
should be on. How, I have no idea, I haven't thought of a good synta
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 10:05 -0700, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > nope that would mean that some scripts might work different between 5.2
> > and 5.3, now one gets an error. consider such a script:
>
> Just so it is clear - some scripts ALREADY work differently, that's why
> it says "BC b
Hi!
In fact, all HASH_OF was removed in standard/array.c, and that's
already is mentioned implicitly though, as
"The functions next()/current/… don't take objects anymore as
parameters. For accessing their properties using this way you have to
cast the objects to arrays first."
... is a very "
Hi!
nope that would mean that some scripts might work different between 5.2
and 5.3, now one gets an error. consider such a script:
Just so it is clear - some scripts ALREADY work differently, that's why
it says "BC break".
In <= 5.2 it will return the value of $o->prop, in 5.3 it would
Hello,
I have reported this bug http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=46354, because
new behaviour breaks my script. The question is how fix scripts for new
behaviour. Example:
// common array
$a = array('item' => NULL);
isset($a['item']) -> FALSE
array_key_exists($a['item']) -> TRUE
// ArrayObject
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 13:15 +0400, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Ionut Gabriel Stan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But wouldn't be useful to at least accept objects implementing ArrayAccess?
>
> sounds like a good idea to me
nope that would mean that some scripts m
On 24.10.2008 16:15, Felipe Pena wrote:
> Hi youngs,
>
> What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
>
> Well, That isn't a task for me, ... just for remember!
>
http://news.php.net/php.internals/25296 =)
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe,
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 14:37 +0200, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> On 24.10.2008, at 14:15, Felipe Pena wrote:
>
> > Hi youngs,
> >
> > What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
>
>
> +1 (not wearing my RM hat .. so its not a final decision yet)
I can't image a single reason to keep it, did anybody, within
+1
On 24-Oct-08, at 8:15 AM, Felipe Pena wrote:
Hi youngs,
What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
Well, That isn't a task for me, ... just for remember!
--
Regards,
Felipe Pena
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Ilia
On 24-Oct-08, at 3:47 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
The second release candidate of 5.2.7 was just released for testing
and can be
downloaded here:
Could you please announce your plans for 5.2.7? I've some things to
merge but hadn't found the time
>>
>> What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
>>
+1
--
Slan,
David
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
2008/10/24 Felipe Pena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi youngs,
>
> What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
>
> Well, That isn't a task for me, ... just for remember!
+1 from me aswell, It doesn't looks like its maintained in php
anymore, nor does looks like its active developed anymore.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
On 24.10.2008, at 14:15, Felipe Pena wrote:
Hi youngs,
What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
+1 (not wearing my RM hat .. so its not a final decision yet)
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www
But I've heard in my computer class that goto can be dangerous and
should be avoided! :)
+1 for me.
Olivier
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Felipe Pena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi youngs,
>
> What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
>
> Well, That isn't a task for me, ... just for remember!
--
Hi youngs,
What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
Well, That isn't a task for me, ... just for remember!
--
Regards,
Felipe Pena
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi Stas,
2008/10/23 Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi!
>
>>> I notice that 5.3 differs from 5.2 in how array_key_exists treats
>>> objects. In 5.2, if the second parameter (array) is allowed to be object
>>> and HASH_OF is applied to it. However, in 5.3 it would produce a warning
>>> re
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Ionut Gabriel Stan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But wouldn't be useful to at least accept objects implementing ArrayAccess?
sounds like a good idea to me
>
> On 10/23/2008 23:40, Mark van der Velden wrote:
>>
>> Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I n
But wouldn't be useful to at least accept objects implementing ArrayAccess?
On 10/23/2008 23:40, Mark van der Velden wrote:
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I notice that 5.3 differs from 5.2 in how array_key_exists treats
objects. In 5.2, if the second parameter (array) is allowed to be obj
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>
>> The second release candidate of 5.2.7 was just released for testing and can
>> be
>> downloaded here:
>
> Could you please announce your plans for 5.2.7? I've some things
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> The second release candidate of 5.2.7 was just released for testing and can be
> downloaded here:
Could you please announce your plans for 5.2.7? I've some things to
merge but hadn't found the time yet to do so.
>
> The Windows binaries should bec
21 matches
Mail list logo
